Re: ActiveX on Linux/UNIX?

Subject: Re: ActiveX on Linux/UNIX?
From: Peter Harkins <ph-tw -at- malaprop -dot- org>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 22:57:22 -0700


On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 09:46:16PM -0700, Andrew Plato wrote:
> You can EASILY configure your Windows machines to prevent ANY component Java,
> ActiveX, etc. from running automatically. Very similar to the Mozilla
> configurations.
> [snip]
> If the component doesn't run, then it exposes no security flaw. Simple as that.

This is correct, but something of a strawman. The original comment was
referencing the fact that if you do run an ActiveX object (for whatever
reason), then it can violate security (read files, etc) in ways that other
plugins (Flash, Java) are properly prevented from doing so.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

NEED TO PUBLISH YOUR FRAMEMAKER CONTENT ONLINE?
?Mustang? (code name) is a NEW online publishing tool for FrameMaker that
lets you easily single-source content to Web, intranets, and online Help.
The interface is designed for FrameMaker users, so there is little or no
learning curve and no macro language required! See a live demo that
will take your breath away: http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l3

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



References:
Re: ActiveX on Linux/UNIX?: From: Andrew Plato

Previous by Author: Re: ActiveX on Linux/UNIX?
Next by Author: Re: Leaving Techwhirlers
Previous by Thread: Re: ActiveX on Linux/UNIX?
Next by Thread: Re: ActiveX on Linux/UNIX?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads