TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: active vs. passive voice From:"Susan W Gallagher" <susanwg -at- gmail -dot- com> To:"Leonard C. Porrello" <Leonard -dot- Porrello -at- soleratec -dot- com> Date:Thu, 27 Mar 2008 14:55:28 -0700
First, assuming that the reader will take the time to read a whole two
sentences is dangerously optimistic - it usually doesn't happen. I refer you
to this article by Mike Hughes, who cautions writers to put the important
stuff in the _first_three_words_ of a step, because sometimes that's all the
attention span you get. http://www.uxmatters.com/MT/archives/000242.php
I was lucky enough to be scheduled in the second half of the session when
Mike first presented this research at the (1998 I think) annual STC bash. He
makes sense - read the article.
And second, conventional tech-writing wisdom says to stick with the present
tense for just the reasons that Fred gave and because it's easier to read
and process. All of the technical writing text books I've ever seen, as well
as the MMoS, say to use the present tense. This isn't news.
Third - to get back to the discussion at hand - I have no problem with using
"appears" or "opens", or even "is displayed". Please just remember this -
unless you are writing about the mating rituals of certain members of the
animal kingdom, "displays" is a transitive verb, TYVM. <g>
-Sue Gallagher
On 3/27/08, Leonard C. Porrello <Leonard -dot- Porrello -at- soleratec -dot- com> wrote:
>
> Good question. I was assuming the reader would read both sentences
> before carrying out the directions... So, the event
> that takes place after he clicks <New Entry> actually occurs in the
> future...
From: Fred Ridder [mailto:docudoc -at- hotmail -dot- com]
> (B) "1. Click <New Entry>. The New Entry window will appear."
Why introduce the future tense? I don't see that it adds any
meaning. In fact, it seems to dissociate the result from its
cause because it carries some implication that the appearance
of the window might not be immediate.
And it still doesn't address the objection of the people who
believe that the verb "appear" is somehow supernatural
because it is the opposite of "disappear".
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-