TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Thank you, Dan, for just letting me be me. I don't know what I would do without you.
-----Original Message-----
From: techwr-l-bounces+lporrello=illumina -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com [mailto:techwr-l-bounces+lporrello=illumina -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com] On Behalf Of Dan Goldstein
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 9:21 AM
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Subject: RE: WRONG!..... -ish?
Obviously, you should do whatever works best for yours. Happy Friday!
-----Original Message-----
From: Porrello, Leonard [mailto:lporrello -at- illumina -dot- com]
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 12:12 PM
To: 'Cardimon, Craig'; 'David Harrison'; Dan Goldstein; 'techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com'
Subject: RE: WRONG!..... -ish?
I find the appeal to corporate authority interesting, but I am not convinced. I try to keep my documentation as exclusively focused as possible on the user, the process, and the artifact being documented. In "We recommend," you add the opinion of the company as a fourth element.
I don't think a reader will be devastated or confused by this. However, I don't think it is necessary in most cases. A case in which I do see a need to insert the manufacturer is when you need to limit liability.
Craig said, "'It is best to' still sounds wishy-washy." In the context of a recommendation being made in a user guide, I don't see it. In addition, you can say "best" with confidence and authority. For example, "It is best to avoid eating rotten food." Does this mean that you should never eat rotten food or that avoiding rotten food is always the best thing to do? No, the statement leaves room for a response to mitigating circumstances. It is arguably better to eat some types of rotten food than it is to starve, and I don't think that anyone who reads "it is best to avoid eating rotten food" is going to think, "But what if I am starving?"
David said, "'we recommend' is read as a suggestion from the supplier or manufacturer and not the writer or speaker." I took that as a given.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
