TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Robo vs Flare From:Reshma <reshma_pendse -at- yahoo -dot- co -dot- in> To:"Heider, Heidi" <heidi -dot- heider -at- twcable -dot- com> Date:Tue, 4 Jun 2013 22:30:33 +0530
Flare 9, hands down. Let me count the ways:
1. Single sourcing to multiple outputs including mobile web help.
2. Seamless integration with TFS and a couple other version control repositories.
3. Write in the text or XML editor, and view in either.
4. Free Capture for images.
5. Easy to use style sheet.
6. Great support and forums.
That's just the tip of the iceberg. I'm so comfortable with Flare that just the thought of going back to RH is scary.
Regards,
Reshma
Sent from my iPhone, please ignore typos.
On 04-Jun-2013, at 9:05 PM, "Heider, Heidi" <heidi -dot- heider -at- twcable -dot- com> wrote:
>
> HAT lovers, pls forgive me if this has been hashed & rehashed to the ground.
>
> I DID search the archives first, and found out that some believed that Flare 7 was better for content management and Robo 8 performed better for Interactive content.
>
> But now Flare 9 and Robo 10 are here. I'm going to see demos from both companies this week, so I want to hear what yooz guyz-the peeps who use these tools-think.
>
> Personally, I like user-friendly super-intuitive products. The more I can just figure it out and guess as I go, the happier I am. (Do all tech writers hate reading user manuals, or is it just all humans? ;-)
>
> Which do you prefer, and/or for what purposes? And if you can't stand talking about these tools any more, no offense taken-pls point me in the right direction.
>
> Thanks comrades! ;-)
>
>
>
> Heidi Heider
> Content Manager | Portals Marketing
> Time Warner Cable Business Class
> 2551 Dulles View Drive | Herndon, VA 20171
> (703) 713-9204 (o) | (202) 277-7687 (m)
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> New! Doc-to-Help 2013 features the industry's first HTML5 editor for authoring.
>
> Learn more: http://bit.ly/ZeOZeQ
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as reshma_pendse -at- yahoo -dot- co -dot- in -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
>http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.
>
> Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com
>
> Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
New! Doc-to-Help 2013 features the industry's first HTML5 editor for authoring.