TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
WebWorks has an output format with built-in responsive design. It's very nice for smaller mobile devices, such as my phone. I haven't used Flare, so maybe it has something similar...
tims
-----Original Message-----
From: techwr-l-bounces+timothy -dot- slager=dematic -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com [mailto:techwr-l-bounces+timothy -dot- slager=dematic -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com] On Behalf Of Shawn C
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 2:41 PM
Cc: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Subject: Re: Tools statistics
>Flare's usable but given free choice I'd use FrameMaker plus WebWorks.
I'm curious Robert about your response. Why do you feel that FrameMaker and WebWorks are a better choice for you.
I needed about a good month of working with Flare (to understand its processes and logic) but once I became familiar with Flare, I decided that I could never go back to FrameMaker. It was a huge risk but it is paying off for me now but I also had the advantage of starting from zero; no legacy of FM documents to consider.
I am asking because as a former FrameMaker trainer, I was up against a bit of flak with my FrameMaker colleagues when I announced my decision to abandon FM and I feel to a lot of people misunderstand the shear power of the Flare tool.
It is not my intention to get into a FM vs Flare thing... as long as allows you to do your job effectively, it doesn't matter what you use. :-)
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Robert Lauriston <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com>wrote:
> Flare's usable but given free choice I'd use FrameMaker plus WebWorks.
>
> I've also used RoboHelp and MIF2Go with FM within the past year and I
> think WebWorks is the best of the three single-source add-ons for FM.
> RoboHelp makes FrameMaker look polished and bug-free.
>
> Currently I'm using Confluence plus Scroll add-ons. Well, actually,
> this week I've been working in PowerPoint for Mac, which really puts
> things in perspective.
>
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Shawn C <shawn -at- convergent -dot- io> wrote:
> > Considering my ten year background with FrameMaker, I was going to
> > choose the tool I was familiar with but this company required single
> > source documentation to PDF and Web... FrameMaker isn't quite up to that task!
> My
> > final decision was MadCap Flare.
>
> --
Shawn Connelly
technical writer
<shawn -at- convergent -dot- io>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
New! Doc-to-Help 2013 features the industry's first HTML5 editor for authoring.
