Multitudinous replies to recent sexism postings (squared?)

Subject: Multitudinous replies to recent sexism postings (squared?)
From: Bonni Graham <Bonni_Graham_at_Enfin-SD -at- RELAY -dot- PROTEON -dot- COM>
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 1993 15:25:00 EST

---------------------------- Forwarded with Changes ---------------------------
From: karenk -at- NETCOM -dot- COM at ARPA
Date: 10/7/93 12:18PM
To: bonni graham at Enfin-SD
*To: techwr-l -at- osuvm1 -dot- bitnet at ARPA
Subject: Re: Reply to: Re: Reply to: Re: Recent sexism postings
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I've gotten some interesting feedback on this issue -- some of it addressing
the concepts I thought I was expressing (and bringing up valid examples of
sloppy writing on my part -- thanks Karen! :)), and some of it addressing
other things entirely. I was trying to turn the focus to understanding what
needs to be unlearned before new attitudes or concepts can be learned or
relearned, using Norm's example as a **case in point** not a be-all-end-all,
main issue. I guess I didn't make that clear. It's interesting that even
among professional communicators there can be miscommunication. It's a good
thing we have this forum to practice among ourselves! <sheepish grin>

Bonni Graham


Previous by Author: Re: Reply to: Re: Reply to: Re: Recent sexism postings
Next by Author: Re: Reply to(squared) Recent sexism postings
Previous by Thread: Briefings, request for formats, etc.
Next by Thread: English to Japanese translation


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads