TechWhirl Sponsors

---

 

TECHWR-L Mailing List Archive October 1993

---

778 messages

Author Index (Switch to Thread Index)

---

(Tom Roberts)

• Computer-aided indexing

_Two_ sexes? How very special.

• Re: Professional Writing Advisory Boards
• Re: Greetings

Ad absurdum per aspera

• Re: What is the medium we are using?
• Re: TECHWR-L Digest - 5 Oct 1993 to 6 Oct 1993
• Re: Responsible use of Obviously
• Re: Quotes in writing
• Re: Northern California Tech. Pubs Competition
• Re: Greetings
• Re: business cards
• Re: dress codes
• Re: Technical writer/engineer nightmares
• Re: Dress codes
• Re: Technical writer/engineer nightmares
• Re: Tele-commuting
• Re: Upgrading the classics

Alun Whittaker

• Re: Job Posting
• Online Help Style Guidelines
• Re: Dress Codes
• Re: geological prospects
• Re: geological prospects
• Re: Technical writer/engineer nightmares
• Tele-commuting
• Re: Grad school (PhDs)
• Re: Upgrading the classics
• Re: Importance of accuracy
• Re: Grad school (PhDs)

Amy Rybak

• Re: Grad school vs. the world
• Contract Writing Position
• Re: Contract rates
• Re: Contract Writing Position

Anatole Wilson

• Quotes on Writing
• Quotes
• Business Card Design
• templates
• dress codes
• telecommuting

Andrea Alvarado

• Re: Employment Discrimination and Tech Communication
• How to join PIC on Scientific Information?

Andrew Davis

• Re: Contract rates
• Job Search Info for the Silicon Valley, CA, companies

Andrew Shires

• Recent sexism postings

Ann Amsler

• Re: STC

Ann Balaban

• Re: SEXISM
• Re: Employment Discrimination and Tech Communication
• Re: Internet guide (was: Invitations to Oct. NNE STC meeting)
• Re: your mail

Barbara Rigg-Healy

• Zen and the Art of the Internet
• O'Reilly's Global Navigator
• Kachina Chapter meeting announcement

Barry Maid

• Re: Hillary Clinton's Medical Dictionary
• Re: Grad school (PhDs)

Beth C. Staats

• Calling all Tucson tech writers
• On-line vs. online
• Translating Ventura

Binion Amerson

• Re: black technical writers

Bonni Graham

• Re: Reply to: Re: Reply to: Re: Recent sexism postings
• Multitudinous replies to recent sexism postings (squared?)
• Re: Reply to(squared) Recent sexism postings
• Re[2]: TECHWR-L Digest - 5 Oct 1993 to 6 Oct 1993
• Re: Class Registration
• Re: Primordial technical writing
• Re[2]: Responsible use of Obviously
• Re: Justifying Additional Staff
• Re[2]: Northern California Tech. Pubs Competition
• Re[5]: Responsible use of Obviously
• Re: request for volunteer opportunities
• Re: Punctuation in 24 hour system (fwd)
• Re[2]: Invitation to the October Northern New England STC me
• Re: Internet guide (was: Invitations to Oct. NNE STC meeting
• Re[2]: Pet Peeves
• tammy williams' internet address
• Re[2]: Invitation to the October Northern New England STC me
• Re: Tech Comm programs in Boston?
• Re[2]: Videotapes of presentations
• Re: Message not deliverable
• Re: Company Style Sheets
• Re: Greetings
• updated videotape costs
• Re[2]: updated videotape costs
• Re: Technical writer/engineer nightmares
• Re[2]: Grad school vs. the world
• Re: Contract rates
• Re[3]: Grad school vs. the world
• Re[2]: your mail
• Re: On-line vs. online
• Re[2]: On-line vs. online
• PPS to Re:[2] on-line vs. online
• Re: my e-mail program
• Re[2]: my e-mail program
• Re: Two-word noun?
• Re[2]: Q: Word vs. Frame
• Re: Translating Ventura
• Re[2]: Grad school (PhDs)
• Re: est. hours

Brad Mehlenbacher

• Re: Recent sexism postings
• Re: Online Help Guidelines
• What Practitioners Want From the Academy (*Long Msg: Research Results*)
• Re: Grad school (PhDs)
• Re: Re[2]: Grad school (PhDs)
• Re: Grad school (PhDs)
• Re: Grad school (PhDs)
• Re: Defining Human Factors

Brian Daley

• Justifying Additional Staff
• Justifying Additional Staff
• Re: Interactive tutorial tools for WINDOWS
• CAP-L

Bruce B. Harper

• Re: Internet guide (was- Inv
• Re: Job Posting
• Re: dress codes

BURGAMW1

• Re: Punctuation...
• Internet info
• Re: STC PIC on Scientific Communication
• Re: contract rates

Carel . J . Jansen

• [no subject]

Carl Miller

• Re: Recent sexism postings

Carl Young (Lookout Mountain Communications)

• Re: Translating Ventura

Carol Engle

• Re: Recent sexism postings

Carolyn Kasky

• Re: request for volunteer opportunities
• Looking for journal

Carrie Walljasper

• Re: Indexing advice

Chad Hill

• Re: Forwarded: sexism and racism

Charles Fisher

• Hillary Clinton's Medical Dictionary
• Re: Screen captures for MS-windows
• Re: FrameMaker V4
• Re: writing sayings
• STC DC Chapter October 1993 Meeting
• Re: Professional Writing Advisory Boards
• Re: Total Quality Leadership and Writing
• Re: STC Reg II Conf
• Re: Q: Word vs. Frame
• STC DC Chapter's 11/93 Meeting

Charles P. Campbell

• Re: Gender vs. Sex
• Re: Recent sexism postings
• Re: TECHWR-L Digest - 5 Oct 1993 to 6 Oct 1993
• Re: Greetings
• Re: On-line vs. online

Charles Woodson

• What is the medium we are using?

Chet W. Cady

• Capturing Windows, printing in B&W
• Re: `Gender' vs. `sex'
• Re: Responsible use of `obviously'
• More writing quotations

Chet_Cady

• Writing quotation
• Reply to: Re: Online Help Style Guidelines

Chris Goolsby

• Dress codes
• Re: Total Quality Leadership and Writing
• Re: Work Environment

Christie S. Johnson

• Tech Comm programs in Boston?

Christie S. Johnson, Office Automation

• What list am I on?

Christy Yoder

• Re: free sub. to Elec. Pub. Mag.
• Re: Job Search Info.

Chuck

• Re: TECHWR-L Digest - 29 Sep 1993 to 30 Sep 1993
• Re: Punctuation in 24 hour system (fwd)
• Re: Punctuation in 24 hour system (fwd)

Chuck Banks

• Re: numbers??
• black technical writers
• Re: SGML - Tell me about it.
• Evaluating user interface
• What and Why (was Nazi Rhetoric)
• Re: What and Why (was Nazi Rhetoric)
• Re: Responsible use of Obviously
• Multimedia
• Re: Internet guide
• Re: cross-posting
• Re: Company Style Sheets
• Re: templates
• Total Quality Leadership and Writing
• ISO9000 and Total Quality Managemn
• Grad school vs. the world

Chuck Petch, Editor

• Ideal publishing software
• Re: Grad school vs. the world
• Re: Grad school vs. the world
• Re: On-line vs. online
• Re: Q: Word vs. Frame
• Re: est. hours

Corinne Stefanick

• Re: Employment Discrimination and Tech Communication
• Re: Gender vs. Sex
• Re: `Gender' vs. `sex'
• Re: Recent sexism postings
• Northern California Tech. Pubs Competition
• Re: Greetings
• Re: GOPHER
• Re: Contract rates
• Re: Grad school (PhDs)
• STC Northern California Technical Publications Competition

CYNTHIA HOLLINGSWORTH

• hourly position available

d . venzke

• Re: WordBasic program error

D. A. Smith

• Style Sheet

Daniel John Brinegar

• Re: Thank You/Sorry, guys
• Programmers
• Re: Ideal publishing software

Dave Venzke

• Re: Laser Printers
• Re: Tele-commuting
• Re: Word vs. Frame
• WordBasic programming error

Dave Walker

• Re: A Controversial Thought
• Advanced Technologies PIC
• Re: Dress codes
• Re: Q: Converting Word Doc to ASCII for E-Mailing

David Hamilton

• Re: dress codes
• Re: Technical Wrinting VS. Technical Marketing

David Tietyen

• Mac Lab Software
• Bibliography/Citation Format

david tillyer

• Re: Interactive Tools
• Re: Defining Human Factors

dbsmith

• Re: Interactive tutorial tool for WINDOWS
• Trying to unsub

Debbie N.

• Q: Converting Word Doc to ASCII for E-Mailing
• Re: Q: Converting Word Doc to ASCII for E-Mailing
• Re: Q: Converting Word Doc to ASCII for E-Mailing

Deborah Adair

• Re: Job Search Info.

Dee Shellhorn Long

• Re: Compressed ("telegraphic") technical writing

Dickie Selfe

• free sub. to Elec. Pub. Mag.
• oops on subscription
• Elec. Pub misinformation
• More Elec. Pub. info
• indexing ???
• Re: Electronic Publishing
• cross-posting
• Re: CAP-L long post

Donna Ellis

• Fubar
• Re: Technical writer/engineer nightmares

Dorothy J. Canepari

• Job search

Doug Montalbano

• Re: Job Hunting
• Re: Responsible use of `obviously'

Doug Osborn

• Re: Online Help Style Guidelines
• Re: graphics packages for X windows
• Re: Australian STC members

DTN 381-2430 or 244-7167 (ZKO AKO)

• Invitation to the October Northern New England STC meting

Edward See (695-6418)

• [no subject]

Edwin Putkonen

• Re: User Interface Guidelines
• On-Line Help/Usability

Elaine M Brennan

• Re: SGML - Tell me about it.
• Re: SGML - Tell me about it

Elliott C. Evans

• Re: Mac Lab Software
• Re: Hyphenating "online"

Eric J. Ray

• Reply to Re: Posting for the "Technical Writing List". Best greetings BEN
• Germans seeking internship

Faith Weber

• Re: Responsible use of Obviously
• Re: Pet Peeves
• Re: dress codes
• Re: Accuracy and phrasing in documentation
• Re: Translating Ventura
• Re: ACM SigDoc Conference

Ferstel John W

• Wh. Internet Guide is ONLINE
• Re: O'Reilly's Global Navigator

Focus on 3 things: Quality, Quality, Quality

• Invitation to Northern New England STC meeting

Fred M Jacobson

• A Friday word-choice funny
• Re: What is the medium we are using?
• Re: What is the medium we are using?
• Re: graphics packages for X windows
• Re: Video Tapes/Briding Industry & Academia
• Re: On-line vs. online

Fred Wersan

• Help Tools/ODA/On-line Docs/Usability/Quality

fretz

• Employment Inquiry
• Employment Inquiry

Gary Beason

• accuracy & phrasing in documentation

Gene Barron

• Re: Justifying Additional Staff
• Re: Ideal publishing software

Gordon Meyer

• email,e-mail,Email,E-mail
• Re: dress codes
• Re: Grad school vs. the real w
• Word vs Frame

Greg Kushmerek

• Thank you for the advice
• Excellent Internet Resources
• WANTED: BUSINESS WRITER FOR FOREIGN LANGUAGE SERVICE

H Sargan

• Re: Screen captures for MS-windows

HOLLAND

• Re: A Tech Writing Test
• Watch out for "as well as"
• Re: Pet Peeves

Howard Wood

• Confirm 7d5b4b

IHA2000

• Re: SGML - Tell me about it
• Internet Navigation
• Internet Navigation

Ilana Levenson

• Re: Screen captures for MS-windows
• More on dress codes

Irene Plokar

• Frame & Hypertext Docs

Jacobs Chris

• Thai instructional design

Jan E. Patterson

• graphics packages for X windows
• graphics packages for X windows

Jan Kippenhan

• Job Opening

Jane Torpie

• Re: Screen captures for MS-windows
• seeking software tool information
• humor
• Re[2]: Employment Discrimination and Tech Communication
• Re[2]: What and Why (was Nazi Rhetoric)
• Re[2]: Responsible use of Obviously
• Re[2]: Responsible use of Obviously
• Re[4]: Responsible use of Obviously
• Re: business cards
• Re: business cards
• Re[2]: your mail
• Re: Any WordBasic programmers out there?

Janet Jeffery, UT Aus

• help on writing-editing work flow

Janie Bergen

• COMPUTER WORDS

Jeff Holland

• Re: reference search

Jenna C. Thomas

• Sex vs. Gender

Jill R Shapiro

• Re: Style Guide Elements?
• numbers???

Jim Porter

• Re: Recent sexism postings
• Re: Recent sexism postings
• Re: Pet Peeves

Jim Taylor

• Newsgroup for childrens books
• Responsible use of Obviously
• Graphics packages for X window
• Graphics packages for X window
• Graphics package for X windows
• Graphics packages for X window

Jo Lines

• Job Search Info.

Joe Chew

• 2nd CFP: Special issue of IEEE Trans. Prof. Comm.

Joe Fockler

• Re: Contract rates

John Endicott

• Re: Internet guides
• Re: Internet guide

JOHN W PFEIFER

• Bibliography/Citation Format

Jon Stonecash

• RPLY:CDM -

Jonathan Lavigne

• Re: Online Help Style Guidelines

Joyce Hammock

• Position Available
• STC Reg II Conf

Julie Anderson

• for carolyn kasky

Karen Gwynn

• Re: Screen captures for MS-windows
• Re: Screen captures for MS-windows
• Re: On-line vs. online
• Re: Q: Word vs. Frame

Karen Kay

• Re: Reply to: Re: Reply to: Re: Recent sexism postings
• Re: Re[2]: Responsible use of Obviously
• Re: Re[4]: Responsible use of Obviously
• Re: cross-posting
• Re: E-mail Addresses
• Re: Grad school (PhDs)
• Re: Grad school (PhDs)
• Re: Grad school (PhDs)

Karen Steele

• TECHWR-L
• Re: est. hours

karis william

• Mike Gos' workweek

Kathleen Nosbisch

• Re: On-line documentation groups
• Re: Interactive Tools
• Re: ACM SigDoc Conference

Kathy Barreto

• Re: Tele-commuting
• est. hours

Kathy Viaropulos

• Help with man pages

Katie Schuler

• Q: Word vs. Frame

Kay Schimmelman

• Re: geological prospects
• Re: geological prospects
• Re: geological prospects

Kaye Sykes

• Re: Punctuation in 24 hour system (fwd)

Kelli Martin

• Tutorial vs. User Guide

Kelly Hoffman

• Re: Adobe Acrobat files
• Internet guide (was: Invitations to Oct. NNE STC meeting)
• Re: Mac Lab Software
• Re: Ideal publishing software
• Re: geological prospects
• Re: Grad school vs. the world
• Re: accuracy & phrasing in documentation
• Re: Contract rates
• Re: Re[2]: your mail
• Re: On-line vs. online
• online vs. on-line, again
• Re: my e-mail program

Kelly K. Hoffman

• Re: What is the medium we are using?

Ken d'Albenas

• Compressed ("telegraphic") technical writing
• Re: What is the medium we are using?
• Re: Responsible use of Obviously
• Re: meetings on video
• Saul C's cautions on videotaped meetings
• Technical writer e-mail nightmares
• Re: E-mai1 Ad dress codes

kendal stitzel

• Re: Request for writing quotes
• Re: Technical writer/engineer nightmares
• Re: Word for Windows <--> Word for Mac

Kenneth Palmertree

• Class Registration

Kim Goolsby

• Forwarded: sexism and racism
• Re: Recent sexism postings
• Test (again) - Please ignore
• test again

Kim Redick

• Re: Campbell sexism commentary
• PC
• volunteering in Philly
• meetings on video
• graduate school vs. the world

Kirstin Mathers

• Re: Screen captures for MS-windows
• Re: STC Reg II Conf

laila

• Re: Thanks
• business cards
• geological prospects

Larry Kunz ((919) 254-6395)

• Professional Writing Advisory Boards
• STC Advanced Technology PIC
• STC Scholarships in Technical Communication

Larry Slack

• Re: What is the medium we are using?
• Re: Recent sexism postings

lathropl

• E-mail Addresses

Laura M. Myott

• [no subject]
• Sorry...

Laura Praderio

• Re: geological prospects

Laura Zupko

• Online Help Style Guidelines

LaVonna Funkhouser

• Group behavior
• sci comm/Re: USFWS-one person show
• writing sayings
• Re: Responsible use of Obviously
• reference search
• writing sayings
• Writing Lists from G. Hatch
• Re: Invitation to the October Northern New England STC meting
• Re: cross-posting
• GOPHER
• Re: Interactive tutorial tool for WINDOWS
• Re: Advanced Technologies PIC
• Re: meetings on video
• Re: Online Help Style Guidel
• Re: How to join PIC on Scientific Information?
• Re: geological prospects
• Re: Grad school vs. the world
• Re: Grad school (PhDs)
• Re: Style Sheet
• Australian STC members
• Re: Defining Human Factors
• netettique, subject lines

lcjohn -at- usthk -dot- ust -dot- hk

• Re: Videotaped Instruction

Lee Taylor

• Re: Company Style Sheets

Len Bucuvalas

• Re: Internet guide (was- Inv

Len Olszewski

• Re: Compressed ("telegraphic") technical writing
• Re: COMPUTER WORDS
• Re: Responsible use of Obviously
• Re: Punctuation in 24 hour system (fwd)
• Re: graphics packages for X windows
• Re: cross-posting
• Re: graphics packages for X windows
• Re: templates
• Re: Grad school vs. the world
• Re: Contract rates
• Re: your mail
• Re: Accuracy and phrasing in documentation

Leo . R . Lentz

• Centre for Language and Communication established

Less is more.

• Quotes on Writing

Linda Rose

• Re: Re[2]: Invitation to the October Northern New England STC me
• Re: Q: Converting Word Doc to ASCII for E-Mailing

Linda Wolf

• Re: USFWS-one person show
• Re: Evaluating user interface
• Re: SGML - Tell me about it
• Re: Defense contractors
• Re: Northern California Tech. Pubs Competition
• Company Style Sheets
• Total Quality Leadership and Writing
• Re: Re[3]: Grad school vs. the world

Liora Alschuler

• Re: Interactive Tools
• Re: Article on origins of computer terminology?
• Re: ACM SigDoc Conference

Lisa Kaytes

• online Journal of Technology Education

Liz Babcock

• Scientific Communication PI
• Quotes in writing
• Pet Peeves
• Training Opportunities for
• "Talking head" presentation

Lori Lathrop

• Re: Style Guide Elements?
• Re: numbers???
• Re: TECHWR-L Digest - 5 Oct 1993 to 6 Oct 1993
• Newsgroup for childrens books
• Re: reference search
• Re: Indexing advice
• Re: indexing ???
• Re: Multimedia
• Re: Internet guide
• Re: Computer-aided indexing
• Re: E-mail Addresses
• Re: E-mail Addresses

Louis Rondeau, Redacteur technique

• Re: TECHWR-L Digest - 5 Oct 1993 to 6 Oct 1993

lpraderio

• Re: E-mail addresses
• geological prospects

Lubo Cipin

• Re: Internet guide
• Re: graphics packages for X windows
• Re: graphics packages for X windows
• Re: graphics packages for X windows
• Re: Online Help Style Guidelines

LUPODJ

• subscribe
• Tech Comm in Beantown
• Professional Writing Advisory Boards

M Carl Drott

• Re: Etymological query

Marcia L. Whitmore

• Re: Opinions please

Margaret Gerard

• FrameMaker V4
• FM V4 Training
• Re: Responsible use of Obviously
• Electronic Publishing
• Re: Style Sheets - long post
• Re: templates
• Request from Richard Irvine
• Re: Style Sheet

Margaret Hunt

• Re: Internet Gopher Course

Maria Townsley

• Contract rates

Marian Harry-Young

• Re: business cards
• Re: STC

Mark Levinson

• Behavior
• Dunno
• Digression
• Mysterious thread
• Offer
• The real Motif writing style guide
• Hitler just like Churchill?
• Primordial technical writing
• Non-PC (discretion advised)
• Quotation
• on line
• Two-word noun?

Martin Hollender

• CDM -

Mary A. Geisert

• Re: Job Opening

mary headley

• Re: Contract Writing Position
• Re: Contract rates

MICHAEL A. BURRIS CAMBRIDGE 577-4863

• Greetings

Michael Gos

• Re: numbers???
• Re: Recent sexism postings
• Re: Justifying Additional Staff
• Re: Re[2]: Responsible use of Obviously
• Re: Employment Inquiry
• Re: Dress codes
• Re: Grad school (PhDs)
• Re: Mike Gos' workweek
• Re: Grad school (PhDs)
• Re: Grad school (PhDs)
• Re: Grad school (PhDs)
• Re: PhD's/Work Weeks

Michael McClatchey

• Re: Recent sexism postings
• Re: Recent sexism postings
• Re: TECHWR-L Digest - 5 Oct 1993 to 6 Oct 1993
• Re: Internet guide
• Internet guide available at DEC
• Re: Internet guide at DEC (oops!)
• Re: Videotapes of presentations
• Re: meetings on video
• Re: Q: Word vs. Frame

Michael Mcpherson

• Defense contractors
• Computer-aided indexing

Michele Berkes 615-576-2352

• E-mail
• PCOC 17
• PCOC 17 proceedings

Michelle Valdez

• Interactive tutorial tool for WINDOWS

MIke

• Re: Recent sexism postings
• Re: black technical writers
• Re: Recent sexism postings
• Re: Internet guide (was: Invitations to Oct. NNE STC meeting)
• Re: Computer-aided indexing
• Re: templates
• Re: Employment Outlook
• Re: Job Search Info for the Silicon Valley, CA, companies

Mike McPherson

• Re: Recent sexism postings
• Re: Compressed ("telegraphic") technical writing
• Re: Forwarded: sexism and racism

mjm

• subscribe

MSTSACX

• Thank You
• Employment Discrimination and Tech Communication
• Right On!
• Social Service
• Multimedia
• Videotaped Instruction
• Value of a Ph.Ds.

Mysti

• Re: templates
• Re: templates

nancy ott

• Re: Grad school vs. the world

Nancy Peacock

• Re: Quotes on Writing

nburns

• Re: On-line vs. online
• Re: On-line vs. online
• Re: Re[2]: your mail
• Re: Re[2]: On-line vs. online
• Re: Tutorial vs. User Guide
• Re: Q: Word vs. Frame

Ninety percent of baseball is half mental. -- Yogi Berra

• help

Oppelt

• Re: Request for writing quotes
• Re: Grad school vs. the real w

Pam Tatge

• Re: Quotes on Writing
• Re: Responsible use of `obviously'

Pat Anderson

• Re: SGML - Tell me about it
• Re: Justifying Additional St
• Re: cross-posting
• Re: Online Help Style Guidel
• Re: Mac Lab Software
• Re: Q- Word vs. Frame

Patrick Morgan

• Re: COMPUTER WORDS
• request for volunteer opportunities
• business cards
• STC
• Technical writer/engineer nightmares
• tech writer vs. engineer re-request

Patrick O'Connell

• [no subject]
• Re: Q: Converting Word Doc to ASCII for E-Mailing
• Re: my e-mail program
• Any WordBasic programmers out there?

Paul Brady

• How to set up non-profit org???

Paul Brady 5797

• Frame User's Group
• Re: templates
• Re: Mac Lab Software

Paula Reynolds

• English to Japanese translation
• English to Japanese translation
• English to Japanese translation
• Stylebooks you create

Peter Kasaty

• Re: Q: Converting Word Doc to ASCII for E-Mailing

Popowicz Alison

• Re: English to Japanese translation

Priscilla Berry

• Re: Job Posting

Q

• On-line documentation groups

r frey

• Re: accuracy & phrasing in documentation

Randy Allen Harris

• Thanks
• Another apology.
• Address query: Giesbrecht
• Etymological query
• Re: Fubar
• Grad school vs. the world
• for Steve Bernhardt; apologies to others

RB800484

• Tech Writ List

REAL programmers don't document...

• Re: Job Posting
• Re: business cards
• Re: templates
• Re: templates
• Re: Dress codes
• Re: templates
• Re: More on dress codes
• Tech writing with biology option
• Re: geological prospects
• Re: Programmers
• Re: Dress codes
• Re: Re[2]: accuracy & phrasing in documentation
• Re: Style Sheet

Reenie Prettyman, ITB

• CONFERENCE on CD-ROM

Richard elGurutm Howland-Bolton

• Re: Recent sexism postings
• Re: Responsible use of Obviously
• Re: my e-mail program
• Re: my e-mail program
• Re: Grad school (PhDs)
• Re: Grad school (PhDs)
• Re: Grad school (PhDs)

Richard Irvine

• Request for research information
• Re: Internet guide
• Re: my e-mail program
• Re: Style Sheet
• Re: Style Sheet

Robert Bononno

• Re: A Friday word-choice funny
• Re: What is the medium we are using?
• Re: What is the medium we are using?
• Re: E-mail
• Re: CDM -
• Re: CDM -
• Re: What is the medium we are using?
• Punctuation in 24 hour system (fwd)
• Re: Punctuation in 24 hour system (fwd)
• Re: Punctuation in 24 hour system (fwd)
• Re: Punctuation in 24 hour system (fwd)
• Re: Punctuation in 24 hour system (fwd)
• Re: Article on origins of computer terminology?

Rockie J Beaman

• unsubscribe

Ron Hart

• Request for Information
• PIC Clarification
• Charges for Reproducing Manuals

Rosalyn Collins

• My subscription
• Help

ROSE NORMAN

• Recent sexism postings
• Re: Recent sexism postings
• Warnings, citation on
• Briefings, request for formats, etc.
• Evaluating user interface

Russell H. Whyte

• Re: Laser Printers
• Re: E-mail Addresses

S.North

• Re: Compressed ("telegraphic") technical writing
• Looking for Reprints/Copies
• Reprinting Postings
• What and Why (was Nazi Rhetoric)
• [no subject]

Saeed Vahid

• Re: Recent sexism postings

sanders_j

• Re: What is the medium we are using?
• Work Environment
• Re: Q: Word vs. Frame

Sarah Harris

• Re: cross-posting and quoting

Shannon Ford

• Re: Resumes
• Re: SGML - Tell me about it.
• Re: Reprinting Postings
• Re: gender vs. sex
• Re: FrameBuilder
• Re: Evaluating user interface
• Re: SGML - Tell me about it
• Adobe Acrobat files
• Suggested reading for tutorial-making

SLATTERYS

• Re: Grad school vs. the world

Stefan Fielding-Isaacs

• Re: est. hours

Stephen Bernhardt

• Re: Dress codes
• Re: Dress codes
• Re: Grad school vs. the world
• Re: Re[3]: Grad school vs. the world

Steve Abatangle

• Re: Responsible use of Obviously

Steve Barnet

• Re: Etymological query
• Re: TECHWR-L Digest - 5 Oct 1993 to 6 Oct 1993
• Responsible use of Obviously

Steve Fouts

• What is the medium we are using?
• Re: numbers???
• Gender vs. Sex
• Re: TECHWR-L Digest - 5 Oct 1993 to 6 Oct 1993
• Re: Request for writing quotes
• Re: Primordial technical writing
• Re: Laser Printers
• Word for Windows <--> Word for Mac
• Re: Confirm 7d5b4b

Steven Owens

• Multimedia
• Internet guide (was: Invitations to Oct. NNE STC meeting)
• Zen and the Art of the Internet
• graphics packages for X windows
• Article on origins of computer terminology?

Stuart Selber

• Re: Recent sexism postings
• Nazi Rhetoric
• Gender Postings
• Re: What and Why (was Nazi Rhetoric)
• Video Tapes/Briding Industry & Academia
• Re: Video Tapes/Briding Industry & Academia
• Re: Grad school vs. the world
• Re: Grad school vs. the world
• On-Line Help/Usability
• Tutorials/User Guides
• PhD's/Work Weeks
• ACM SigDoc Conference

Susan Gallagher

• Re: Online Help Style Guidelines
• Re: Advanced Technologies PIC
• Re: Mac Lab Software
• Re[2]: Technical writer/engineer nightmares
• Re: accuracy & phrasing in documentation
• Re[2]: accuracy & phrasing in documentation
• Re[2]: Q: Converting Word Doc to ASCII for E-Mailing
• Re[2]: accuracy & phrasing in documentation
• Re: help on writing-editing work flow

Susan Mitchell

• STC Silicon Valley Chapter October Meeting

Susan Sellew

• Re: Screen captures for MS-windows

Susan Winer Slavin

• Etymological query

Tammy Williams

• Reply to: Re: Reply to: Re: Recent sexism postings
• Job Hunting

Tamye Lyles, Technical Writer--Martin Marietta Services Inc., 301 794-9600 x151

• Re: Digression
• Re: Opinions please
• Re: Opinions please
• Re: Invitation to the October Northern New England STC meting
• Re: Internet guide (was: Invitations to Oct. NNE STC meeting)
• Re: Internet guide
• Re: Wh. Internet Guide is ONLINE
• Laser Printers
• Re: Re[2]: Invitation to the October Northern New England STC me
• Re: Re[2]: Videotapes of presentations
• Re: updated videotape costs
• Re: Total Quality Leadership and Writing
• Employment Outlook
• For Mike McPherson--Employment Outlook (Sorry, but the mail keeps bouncing when sent directly.)
• Platform Compatibility for WordPerfect

Thomas Barker

• Re: TECHWR-L Digest - 5 Oct 1993 to 6 Oct 1993

Thomas Horton

• TECH & SCI COMM,Past MS Grads from DREXEL U.
• Technical Wrinting VS. Technical Marketing

Tom Hoyt

• Re: Style Sheet

Tracey Showalter

• Re: Internet guide (was- Inv
• Job Posting
• Job Posting- Location Info
• Sharlyn Avina are you there
• Word and WinWord
• Re: On-line vs. online
• my e-mail program
• Savvy QuickMail People
• Word, connected files, pagi

Traci Gardner

• Re: E-mail Addresses
• Re: Meaningful "subject" lines

Turing Machine Three

• Re: Recent sexism postings
• Re: Behavior
• Re: Dunno
• CLIPPED_WORDS
• Re: Digression
• SEXISM
• Re: What list am I on?

Undetermined origin c/o Postmaster

• Re: Justifying Additional Staff
• Test
• Test

Unknown

• [no subject]

USA::IT9371

• Re: Contract rates

Vicki Rosenzweig

• sexism and racism
• Re: What is the medium we are using?
• Re: Request for writing quotes
• Re: Internet guide (was- Inv
• Re: business cards
• Meaningful "subject" lines

W Pienciak

• Re: E-mail Addresses
• Re: E-mail Addresses

William C. Stolgitis

• STC

Young Kim

• Re: Grad school vs. the world

Z3BCG

• Re: Grad school vs. the world

---

Author Index (Switch to Thread Index)

---

---

---