TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
It sounds to me that E-Prime is more than the verb "to be"
but all linking verbs. Is that right? (Or should I just ask:
Right?)
Since you can't say "This is E-Prime" in E-Prime, how do you
get around it? Something like "I write in E-Prime?" or
something?
This technique seems interesting since there's always a more
expressive word to use in place of "to be". However, the
passive voice should be mastered, not slaughtered. Where
would we be without the line in _Death of a Salesman_
"Respect will be given!" That's passive voice used at its
ultimate excellence!!
Like any technique, E-Prime seems to have some good aspects
and benefits. It also has some faults. Let's not rid the
prose we write of either the verb "to be" or the passive
voice. Instead, let's use them intelligently instead of
abundantly.