TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: where to buy books From:Peter Kent <techwr -at- ARUNDEL -dot- COM> Date:Wed, 11 Jun 1997 11:37:47 -0600
> At 08:33 AM 6/11/97 -0600, Peter Kent wrote:
>>> royalties are stepped -- rate 1 for books purchased by
>>> the small stores at standard price, rate 1/x for books purchased
>>> by big chains at a deep discount. Most of the books
>>> sold -- at least on our royalty statements -- are sold to the
>>> big chains.
Actually I didn't say the above, though maybe I was quoting it in a message
of mine.
> This is true to a certain extent, although 'most' is an exaggeration. If
> the drop in rate is significant, you've been had. As an aside, they
> should
> also be stepped the other way. (No, 'standard contracts' never include
> this. You have to ask, but it was never denied, in my experience). That
> is,
> if more than xx copies are sold, the rate goes up 1%, past yy, another
> .5%
> etc.
Quite right, but that's related to the number of books sold, not to the
discounts. The rates may go 8%, 10%, 12%, 15%, for instance.
>>I said that an author's cut is dependent on the discount at which the
>>book
>>was sold; the deeper the discount, the less the author earns, and with
>>very
>>deep discounts the author's earnings begin to drop dramatically.
> Your agent has not done a very good job. Royalty rates should be
> calculated
> (and you can almost always negotiate this) on the 'suggested' retail
> price.
No, this is not correct for the computer-book business. Virtually all
computer-book royalties are paid as a percentage of net, not the list price.
It's very rare for a computer-book to pay based on list price. I realize,
however, that trade books are typically paid on list price, but that's
really a different business.
> As Eric noted, such suggested prices are often stepped, but the steps
> should not be THAT deep.
Once you're over a 60% discount, rates will typically drop by half; instead
of getting 10% of the net, you'll get 5% of the net for example (and of
course the net is lower, too).
>>this in its contract: "xxx will not pay royalties on copies of the work
>>that
>>xxx sells or disposes of at or below bound cost; e.g., the sum of
>>printing,
>>paper, binding, packing, and transport." (That's a typical clause; all
>>contracts have something similar to this.) Remaindered books are
>>generally
>>sold at or below bound cost--they're just clearing out stock--so the
>>author
>>will generally get nothing from the sale.
>>From an agent's point of view, I'll tell you this: first of all,
>>anything
> and everything is negotiable.
You'll often hear agents say this, but there are certain realities they have
to work within, and one of those realities is that you won't get a publisher
to pay you royalties on remaindered books. Okay, maybe you will if you're
Stephen King (but even then I doubt it). If the publisher is virtually
giving the book away, making less than the book costs to print, there's no
way you're going to convince them to pay you a royalty!
>BUT, we used to have a saying: If you are getting
> royalties, we haven't done our job. If it actually comes down to
> royalties,
> if you've earned out your advance, then you need to renegotiate a bigger
> advance on the next book. If you consistently earn out and are relying on
> the trickle down of royalties, it's time to find yourself a new agent.
This is unrealistic in the computer-book business (I assume Ginna worked in
trade, not computer books). Even top computer-book authors still get
relatively small advances. Books that make the author $200,000 in royalties,
and which are expected to make that sort of money, may only earn a $10,000
or $20,000 advance. In "the old days" advances of $50,000 were not uncommon,
and even some $1m advances were paid. But these days advances are not based
on the expected earnings of the book.
BTW, just for a little background:
* I've written 30 computer books.
* I've had three or four best sellers (depending on what you want to call a
best seller, of course): The Complete Idiot's Guide to the Internet, Using
Netscape, Discover Windows NT Workstation, and The Official Netscape
JavaScript Book.
* I've worked with a dozen or so publishers.
* I use Waterside Productions, the world's largest and most experienced
computer-book agency (they've signed 5,000 computer books).
The computer-book business is very different from trade books, and some
things may look bad from the perspective of a trade-book agent. However,
there's a flip side; computer-book writing is generally much more profitable
than trade-book writing, so even though you may get an advance that's a
smaller proportion of the projected royalties, for instance, those royalties
will probably be much, much larger than if you'd been writing a trade book!
Peter Kent
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Coming in the fall, the revised Technical Writer's Freelancing
Guide. New Title: Making Money in Technical Writing. 80 percent
more info. See http://www.arundel.com/techwr for more...
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html