Re: Interview questions (not a flame)

Subject: Re: Interview questions (not a flame)
From: "Porrello, Leonard" <lcporrel -at- ESSVOTE -dot- COM>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 16:32:00 -0600

The determination of whether Garret's is a "old-boys" network would come from whom he excludes and why. It sounds like he is willing to meet just about anyone who is interested in buying him lunch. ;-)

Leonard Porrello

----------
From: sbrowne
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 1999 4:12 PM
To: TECHWR-L; LCPORREL
Subject: Re: Interview questions (not a flame)

I fail to see this as an "old-boys network" in any way.
Scott


Diane Gutierrez wrote:

Do we want to see formation of an
> old-boys network impossible for newcomers and solitary talents to break into,
> or do we want to see an equitable, worth-is-measured and quality-is-rewarded
> system of hiring? Sheesh!

> Garret Romaine wrote:

>>>>I like to network so intensely that I already know who I want to hire
before
I have the opening approved. The interview then consists mostly of "How are
the kids?" This involves going to a lot of extra meetings every month,
having lunch with old friends and new acquaintences, and putting a little
effort into staying in touch. But at least I don't have to ask a perfect
stranger about their innermost fears and inadequacies.<<<<<<


From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000


Previous by Author: Re: Gerunds in titles and headings
Next by Author: Re: Request for diplomacy training
Previous by Thread: Re: Interview questions (not a flame)
Next by Thread: Response to Peter Taylor


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads