Re: WRONG!..... -ish?
The question was about grammar. Presumably the next sentence explains
the recommendation.
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Cardimon, Craig<ccardimon -at- m-s-g -dot- com> wrote:
Agreed.^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
It is easy enough to say "It is best to use IE because..." or "We recommend using IE because..."
Throw in some explanation to help quench any curiosity. ...
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as kcbillb2 -at- kc -dot- rr -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.
Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com
Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.
Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com
Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
References:
WRONG!..... -ish?: From: McLauchlan, Kevin
Re: WRONG!..... -ish?: From: kcbillb2
RE: WRONG!..... -ish?: From: Dan Goldstein
RE: WRONG!..... -ish?: From: Porrello, Leonard
RE: WRONG!..... -ish?: From: Cardimon, Craig
Re: WRONG!..... -ish?: From: Gene Kim-Eng
RE: WRONG!..... -ish?: From: Cardimon, Craig
Previous by Author:
Re: WRONG!..... -ish?
Next by Author:
Re: naming doc addendums ?
Previous by Thread:
RE: WRONG!..... -ish?
Next by Thread:
Re: WRONG!..... -ish?
Search our Technical Writing Archives & Magazine
Visit TechWhirl's Other Sites
Sponsored Ads