TechWhirl Sponsors

---

 

Threaded TECHWR-L Mailing List Archive November 1993

---

660 messages

Thread Index (Switch to Author Index)

---

• Re: Value of a Ph.Ds., Brad Mehlenbacher
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Value of a Ph.Ds., Ed Costello
  • Re: Value of a Ph.Ds., YOUNG
  • Re: Value of a Ph.Ds., Stephen Bernhardt
• Re: Platform Compatibility for WordPerfect, Jacobs Chris
• letterheads & envelopes, laila
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: letterheads & envelopes, Kim Redick
  • Re: letterheads & envelopes, Bonni Graham
  • Re: letterheads & envelopes, Christy Yoder
• Rates: text, graphics, complete documents, etc., Chad Hill
• Mac AVs vs. PowerPC (was: Rates: text, graphics, complete documents, etc.), Kelly Hoffman
• Re: Technical Wrinting VS. Technical Marketing, Len Olszewski
• Technical Writing vs. Marketing Writing, Anatole Wilson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Technical Writing vs. Marketing Writing, Alun Whittaker
  • Re: Technical Writing vs. Marketing Writing, Ad absurdum per aspera
  • technical writing vs. marketing writing, Anatole Wilson
  • Re: technical writing vs. marketing writing, Alun Whittaker
  • Re: technical writing vs. marketing writing, Ad absurdum per aspera
  • Re: technical writing vs. marketing writing, Carl Young (Lookout Mountain Communications)
• Re[2]: Grad school (PhDs), Jane Torpie
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Grad school (PhDs), Stephen Bernhardt
  • Re: Re[2]: Grad school (PhDs), Corinne Stefanick
• Frame to Word Perfect, Chuck Petch, Editor
• The hazards of a literary education, Alun Whittaker
• netettique, included text, Steven Owens
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: netettique, included text, LaVonna Funkhouser
  • netettique, included text, Steven Owens
• How to Plan and Cost an International Writing Project, Concurrent Design=To Profits on Time 381-2690
• Nov meeting, STC Silicon Valley Chapter, Susan Mitchell
• Re: for Steve Bernhardt; apologies to others, Stephen Bernhardt
• Technical and Marketing Communications, MSTSACX
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Technical and Marketing Communications, Kelly Hoffman
• Technical writing and marketing writing, Anatole Wilson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Technical writing and marketing writing, John Fulmer INET
• Re: Word vs Frame, REAL programmers don't document...
• _JTWC_ Call for Papers (2nd post), Randy Allen Harris
• "man" "woman" terminology, ENG396AK
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: "man" "woman" terminology, Corinne Stefanick
• Address for university in US, please?, Shannon Ford
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Address for university in US, please?, Andrew Davis
  • Re: Address for university in US, please?, Hanna Nelson
  • Re: Address for university in US, please?, Shannon Ford
• Relevant academic research and Ph.D.'s, Focus on 3 things: Quality, Quality, Quality
• STC Bulletin Board Address?, Marj Rush Hovde
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: STC Bulletin Board Address?, Andrew Davis
• Re: Style Sheet (Reply to various Replies), Deb Smith
• SIGDOC and ACM, nancy ott
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: SIGDOC and ACM, Brad Mehlenbacher
  • Re: SIGDOC and ACM, Vicki Rosenzweig
  • Re: SIGDOC and ACM, REAL programmers don't document...
  • Re: SIGDOC and ACM, Stephen Bernhardt
• Frame 4 and Word/WordPerfect Output (PC), Charles Fisher
• Tech writing vs market writing, Bjbj
• cultural differences in tech vs. market writing, Shannon Ford
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: cultural differences in tech vs. market writing, John Fulmer INET
  • Re: cultural differences in tech vs. market writing, Fred Wersan
  • Re: cultural differences in tech vs. market writing, Shannon Ford
• Address/Northeastern Univ, Stuart Selber
• Re: SGML, new media, and other hot issues, Marguerite Krupp
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: SGML, new media, and other hot issues, Elaine M Brennan
  • Re: SGML, new media, and other hot issues, Stuart Selber
  • Re[2]: SGML, new media, and other hot issues, Bonni Graham
  • Re: SGML, new media, and other hot issues, Corinne Stefanick
  • Re: SGML, new media, and other hot issues, Ad absurdum per aspera
  • Re: Re[2]: SGML, new media, and other hot issues, K Angelucci
• Bridging the academia-industry gulf (chasm?), Bonni Graham
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Bridging the academia-industry gulf (chasm?), Jim Regan
  • Re: Bridging the academia-industry gulf (chasm?), Stephen Bernhardt
• Bridging the academia-industry gulf -- opportunity?, Bonni Graham
• internship, vanessa
• TQM, or Taking my own advice, Bonni Graham
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: TQM, or Taking my own advice, Karen Steele
  • Re: TQM, or Taking my own advice, Len Olszewski
  • Re: TQM, or Taking my own advice, CARTER HANSEN
• tech writing vs. marketing writing, Anatole Wilson
• Reusable chunks (was: Relevant academic research and Ph.D.'s), Ad absurdum per aspera
• Smalltalk Contractor, Jane Torpie
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Smalltalk Contractor, Philip T. DiPeri
• Educational -v- Informative Writing, Alun Whittaker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Educational -v- Informative Writing, Brian Daley
  • Re: Educational -v- Informative Writing, CARTER HANSEN
• More (questions) about learning Frame, Beth C. Staats
• Educational -v- Informative Writing & Frame ?s, Fred Wersan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Educational -v- Informative Writing & Frame ?s, gary dettmers
• Re: TQM or Barbie Mgmt Style, Alun Whittaker
• FrameMaker docs (was Re: Educational -v- Informative Writing), Kelly Hoffman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: FrameMaker docs (was Re: Educational -v- Informative Writing), Alun Whittaker
• TQM Revisited, Bob Armao
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: TQM Revisited, Michael Gos
  • Re: TQM Revisited, Daniel John Brinegar
  • Re: TQM Revisited, Linda Wolf
  • Re: TQM Revisited, Michael Gos
• Re: TQM-Is it a fad?, Carrie Walljasper
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: TQM-Is it a fad?, Linda Wolf
  • Re: TQM-Is it a fad?, Chuck Banks
  • Re: TQM-Is it a fad?, Ad absurdum per aspera
• Total Quality Management, good business or good buzz words?, Steve Fouts
• Re: TQM, Bonni Graham
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • TQM, Anatole Wilson
  • TQM, Dave Walker
  • Re: TQM, Chuck Banks
• Re: Good News! Isn't feedback great?, Bonni Graham
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Good News! Isn't feedback great?, LaVonna Funkhouser
  • Re: Good News! Isn't feedback great?, Jim Gifford
• Times Roman 'N' Helvetica (formerly SGML, etc.), Bonni Graham
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Times Roman 'N' Helvetica (formerly SGML, etc.), Michael McClatchey
  • Re: Times Roman 'N' Helvetica (formerly SGML, etc.), Corinne Stefanick
  • Re: Times Roman 'N' Helvetica (formerly SGML, etc.), CARTER HANSEN
  • Re: Times Roman 'N' Helvetica (formerly SGML, etc.), Michael McClatchey
• Product liability case, inadequate instructions (OK Chapter of STC), LaVonna Funkhouser
• STC Region 8 Conference (Nov. 6, 1993), Less is more.
• STC Region 7 Conference, Deborah Adair
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • STC Region 7 Conference, Lori Lathrop
• Region 7 Conference, MSTSACX
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Region 7 Conference, Deborah Adair
• Buzzwords, Mark Levinson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Buzzwords, Kelly Hoffman
• Minimalist Document Design, Janie Bergen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Minimalist Document Design, Chuck Banks
  • Re: Minimalist Document Design, Shannon Ford
  • Re: Minimalist Document Design, nburns
  • Minimalist Document Design, David Tietyen
• Re: brainstorming, industry vs. academia, Shannon Ford
• Re: Framers mailing list and bi-monthly publication, Kaye Sykes
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Framers mailing list and bi-monthly publication, Fred Wersan
• Gagger of The Day, JACK P. SHAW
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Gagger of The Day, Brian Daley
  • Re: Gagger of The Day, Jane Torpie
  • Re: Gagger of The Day, Dave Walker
• Re: Q: Word vs. Frame, Daniel John Brinegar
• Overcoming Technophobia, Kim Ballard
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Overcoming Technophobia, Bonni Graham
  • Re: Overcoming Technophobia, Fred Wersan
  • Re: Overcoming Technophobia, Stefan Fielding-Isaacs
  • Re: Overcoming Technophobia, Karen Kay
  • Re[2]: Overcoming Technophobia, Bonni Graham
• Typefaces, Bonnie Nestor (NESTORM -at- FEDC04 -dot- FED -dot- ORNL -dot- GOV
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • typefaces, Anatole Wilson
  • Re: Typefaces, Corinne Stefanick
  • Re: Typefaces, Richard Irvine
  • Re: typefaces, Linda Wolf
  • Re: typefaces, Fred Wersan
  • Re[2]: typefaces, Bonni Graham
  • Re[2]: typefaces, Susan Gallagher
  • Re: typefaces, Deborah Adair
  • Typefaces, Mark Levinson
  • Re: Typefaces, Tamye Lyles, Technical Writer--Martin Marietta Services Inc., 301 794-9600 x151
• Style Guides for Computer Manuals, Thomas Krueger
• UNIVERSITY INFORMATION/SHANNON FORD, Paul Trummel
• Typeface Info, Tracey Showalter
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Typeface Info, Richard Irvine
• SIGDOC notes, Kathleen Nosbisch
• Re: Times Roman 'N' Helvetica, Fred Wersan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Times Roman 'N' Helvetica, Nanette Wright
  • Re: Times Roman 'N' Helvetica, nburns
  • Re: Times Roman 'N' Helvetica, Steve Fouts
  • Re: Times Roman 'N' Helvetica, Ad absurdum per aspera
  • Re: Times Roman 'N' Helvetica, Linda Wolf
• Typefaces discussion, Kathy Barreto
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Typefaces discussion, Bonni Graham
• Re: Times Roman 'N' Helveti, Tracey Showalter
• Font v Typeface (was tr v Helv), Fred Wersan
• Font vs typeface, Pat Anderson
• Re: Bonnie Nestor (mnj -at- ornl -dot- gov)'s message about typefaces, Patrick O'Connell
• Framer's Forum Magazine Address & Phone, Carl Young (Lookout Mountain Communications)
• Re: Minimalist Writing, Dave Venzke
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Minimalist Writing, Len Olszewski
  • Re: Minimalist Writing, Arthur Comings
• thanks: tech wrtr/eng. resends, now more, patrick morgan
• Re: +Postage Due+TQM, or Taking my own advice, Marguerite Krupp
• Re: +Postage Due+Re: TQM, or Taking my own advice, Marguerite Krupp
• TQM: Karen, tell more, LaVonna Funkhouser
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: TQM: Karen, tell more, Karen Steele
• Those "little boxes" are worth a fortune, JACK P. SHAW
• Re: TQM (longish), Chet W. Cady
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: TQM (longish), Daniel John Brinegar
• Customer feedback (formerly Re: Minimalist Writing), Brian Daley
• Re: TECHWR-L Digest - 28 Apr 1993 to 29 Apr 1993, Focus on 3 things: Quality, Quality, Quality
• Re: On-line vs. online, Edward Bedinger
• STC Marketing Communication (MarCom) PIC, Larry Kunz ((919) 254-6395)
• Figures, Len Olszewski
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Figures, Karen Steele
  • Re: Figures, Ad absurdum per aspera
  • Re[2]: Figures, Susan Gallagher
  • Re: Figures, Nancy Burns
  • Re: Figures, Stefan Fielding-Isaacs
  • Re: Figures, Carrie Walljasper
• Indexing Online Books: Cost Effective?, Jon Huxtable
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Indexing Online Books: Cost Effective?, Joan Stout
  • Re: Indexing Online Books: Cost Effective?, Lori Lathrop
  • Re: Indexing Online Books: Cost Effective?, Mark Hagen
  • Re: Indexing Online Books: Cost Effective?, Helena Jerney
  • Re: Indexing Online Books: Cost Effective?, Lori Lathrop
  • Re: Indexing Online Books: Cost Effective?, Mark Hagen
  • Re: Indexing Online Books: Cost Effective?, Lori Lathrop
  • Re: Indexing Online Books: Cost Effective?, Chuck Banks
  • Re: Indexing Online Books: Cost Effective?, Chuck Banks
  • Re: Indexing Online Books: Cost Effective?, Stephen Bernhardt
  • Re: Indexing Online Books: Cost Effective?, Mark Hagen
  • Re: Indexing Online Books: Cost Effective?, Mark Hagen
  • Re: Indexing Online Books: Cost Effective?, Paul Goble
• Disregard my msg on typefaces-it's repetitious, Linda Wolf
• controlled English, Dickie Selfe
• Hypercard Scripting, Linda Wolf
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Hypercard Scripting, Traci Gardner
  • Re: Hypercard Scripting, Brad Mehlenbacher
• Re: Bibliography/Citation Format, lpraderio
• Americans with Disablities Act, Joyce Hammock
• "font" vs "typeface", LaVonna Funkhouser
• Typeface selection is subordinate to doc design, Paul Sholar
• Speaking of Fonts, Eva Thury
• Region 8 Conference LAST CHANCE!, Susan Mitchell
• Deming's 14 Points, Ad absurdum per aspera
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Deming's 14 Points, Steve Fouts
  • Re: Deming's 14 Points, Pam Tatge
  • Re: Deming's 14 Points, Ad absurdum per aspera
  • Re: Deming's 14 Points, Pam Tatge
• cmsg cancel <2bdo1m$91b -at- news -dot- u -dot- washington -dot- edu>, Edward Bedinger
• Mixed-up type, Fred M Jacobson
• block lettering (readability), LaVonna Funkhouser
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: block lettering (readability), Bonni Graham
  • Re: block lettering (readability), Christy Yoder
  • Re: block lettering (readability), John Fulmer INET
  • Re: block lettering (readability), Linda Wolf
• Typeface selection is subordinate to doc design (posting #2), Paul Sholar
• tech comm prof job, LaVonna Funkhouser
• Typeface selection, David Tietyen
• Re: Typeface discussion, Richard Irvine
• Figures in docs, Joan Miles
• Typography/Readability/Legibility, Paul Trummel
• Tech writing vs Marketing writing (Conclusion), Thomas Horton
• Discourse software for the Mac, randy harris
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Discourse software for the Mac, amy welden
• Re: online vs. on-line, again, Ned Bedinger
• Estimating, Margaret Gerard
• Re: SmallTalk names (was "typefaces"), Fred M Jacobson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re[2]: SmallTalk names (was "typefaces"), Susan Gallagher
• On LINGUIST (for Amy and interested others), randy harris
• [no subject], David H. Roberts
• [no subject], Robert Royar
• Information Design Assoc., Margaret Gerard
• CAPS AREN'T JUST HARD TO READ, Gregory=Kushmerek%AcctgMed%FIN
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: CAPS AREN'T JUST HARD TO READ, Daniel John Brinegar
• Learning abilities, Kim Redick
• New Thought on Type and an Introduction, Frank Stearns
• Indexing Online Books, Larry Kunz ((919) 254-6395)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Indexing Online Books, Kathy Barreto
• ethics of technical to marketing writing, Anatole Wilson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • ethics of technical to marketing writing, Steven Owens
  • Re: ethics of technical to marketing writing, Bonni Graham
• More personable tech writing, Susan Gallagher
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: More personable tech writing, Len Olszewski
  • Re[2]: More personable tech writing, Bonni Graham
  • Re: More personable tech writing, fretz
  • Re: Re[2]: More personable tech writing, Stephen Bernhardt
  • Re: Re[2]: More personable tech writing, Margaret Gerard
  • Re: Re[2]: More personable tech writing, Ad absurdum per aspera
  • Re[2]: More personable tech writing, Steven Owens
• All caps - why? (was: block lettering (readability)), Fred M Jacobson
• List produces mugs: Cool!, LaVonna Funkhouser
• Re: All caps - why?, Chuck Banks
• ethics of marketing writing, Anatole Wilson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • ethics of marketing writing, Steven Owens
  • ethics of marketing writing, Anatole Wilson
• TQM and Standards (long), Margaret Gerard
• Ego, Mark Levinson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Ego, Corinne Stefanick
  • Re: Ego, fretz
  • Re: Ego, Ad absurdum per aspera
  • Re[2]: Ego, Bonni Graham
• EFL students in a Tech communication course, lcjohn -at- usthk -dot- ust -dot- hk
• thanks--overcome. technophobia, Kim Ballard
• Business/Career Advice, Karen Steele
• What did I miss?, Marguerite Krupp
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What did I miss?, Steve Fouts
• Visual mess, Steven Owens
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Visual mess, Margaret Gerard
• STC Illinois Chapter, Gayle Wood, ILCSO Office
• Suggestions on document configuration management?, John McMullen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Suggestions on document configuration management?, Margaret Gerard
• Experience with Publish It??, Kirstin Mathers
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Experience with Publish It??, ROY KUNKLE
  • Experience with Publish It??, Steven Owens
  • Re: Experience with Publish It??, Marian Harry-Young
• STC Silicon Valley Chapter November MeetingDON'T FORGET: YOU MUST REGISTER BY THIS THURSDAY!!!, Susan Mitchell
• Science Writing, fretz
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Science Writing, Ad absurdum per aspera
  • Re: Science Writing, Randy Allen Harris
• [no subject], James Conklin
• Re: Using contractions, Shannon Ford
• Setting up online help/documentation systems, Deb Carnegie
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Setting up online help/documentation systems, Janie Bergen
  • Re: Setting up online help/documentation systems, Edwin Putkonen
  • Re: Setting up online help/documentation systems, Deb Carnegie
  • Re: Setting up online help/documentation systems, Janie Bergen
• Contractions, Chet W. Cady
• Re: Suggestions on document, Tracey Showalter
• Re: Ego/personable tech writing, kendal stitzel
• Re Publish It, ROY KUNKLE
• SDSTC Meetings on Tape Series, Bonni Graham
• Technical vs. writing knowledge, Steve Pope
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Technical vs. writing knowledge, Kelly Hoffman
  • Technical vs. writing knowledge, Steven Owens
  • Re: Technical vs. writing knowledge, Chuck Petch, Editor
  • Re: Technical vs. writing knowledge, Brian Daley
  • Re: Technical vs. writing knowledge, Randy Allen Harris
  • Re: Technical vs. writing knowledge, Mike Hamity
  • Re: Technical vs. writing knowledge, Robert McMillan
  • Re: Technical vs. writing knowledge, Rahul Ravel
  • Re: Technical vs. writing knowledge, Brad Mehlenbacher
  • Re: Technical vs. writing knowledge, Bonni Graham
• Re: Thanks for the reply, Steve Pope
• Best, Steve Pope
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Best, Kathleen Kuvinka
• Newsgroup posters, heads up!, Patrick O'Connell
• A little machoist antler-crashing, Mark Levinson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: A little machoist antler-crashing, Brian Daley
  • Re: A little machoist antler-crashing, Chuck Petch, Editor
  • Re: A little machoist antler-crashing, Shannon Ford
• "Best" for technical writers, Steven Owens
• Re: TECHWR-L Digest - 10 Nov 1993 to 11 Nov 1993, Joan Miles
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: TECHWR-L Digest - 10 Nov 1993 to 11 Nov 1993, Thomas Barker
  • Re: TECHWR-L Digest - 10 Nov 1993 to 11 Nov 1993, Thomas Barker
  • Re: TECHWR-L Digest - 10 Nov 1993 to 11 Nov 1993, Stephen Bernhardt
• Technical vs. writing skills, BURGAMW1
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Technical vs. writing skills, Bonnie Nestor (NESTORM -at- FEDC04 -dot- FED -dot- ORNL -dot- GOV
• Technical Writing vs Knowledge, Kris Jaeger
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Technical Writing vs Knowledge, Len Olszewski
  • Re: Technical Writing vs Knowledge, Brian Daley
• Most Important Programs to Learn, Christy Yoder
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Most Important Programs to Learn, Bonni Graham
  • Re: Most Important Programs to Learn, Ad absurdum per aspera
  • Re: Most Important Programs to Learn, Kelly Hoffman
  • Re: Most Important Programs to Learn, Steven Owens
  • Re[2]: Most Important Programs to Learn, Bonni Graham
  • Re: Most Important Programs to Learn, Karen Kay
  • Re: Most Important Programs to Learn, Stefan Fielding-Isaacs
  • Re: Most Important Programs to Learn, Mike Beyries
  • Re: Most Important Programs to Learn, Karen Kay
  • Re: Most Important Programs to Learn, Marjorie Schejter
  • Re: Most Important Programs to Learn, Vicki Rosenzweig
  • Re: Most Important Programs to Learn, Kelly Hoffman
  • Re: Most Important Programs to Learn, Gary Dettmers
  • Re: Most Important Programs to Learn, Tim Pera
  • Re: Most Important Programs to Learn, Gary Dettmers
  • Most Important Programs to Learn, Steven Owens
• ISO 9000, David Tietyen
• Writing Style (was ego), Stuart Selber
• Reply to Technical vs. writing knowledge, Nick Lilly Tarleton State University
• fairly good ain't good enough, Beth C. Staats
• oops -- mangled message, Beth C. Staats
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: oops -- mangled message, 0505EN09
• technical vs. writing experience, Anatole Wilson
• who is ezra shapiro?, Tracey Showalter
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: who is ezra shapiro?, Bonni Graham
• Writing vs Technical - Article, Rahul Ravel
• How Much?, Kathleen Kuvinka
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: How Much?, Nancy Burns
  • Re: How Much?, Helena Jerney
  • Re: How Much?, Andrew Davis
  • Re: How Much?, Joan Miles
  • How Much?, William C. Stolgitis
  • Re: How Much?, Corinne Stefanick
  • Re: How Much?, Guy Haas
  • Re: How Much?, Tamye Lyles, Technical Writer--Martin Marietta Services Inc., 301 794-9600 x151
  • Re: How Much?, Kathleen Kuvinka
  • Re: How Much?, Nancy Burns
• FW: Frame 4.0 Lecture...at next FUNNE meeting, Paul Brady 5797
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • FW: Frame 4.0 Lecture...at next FUNNE meeting, Paul Brady 5797
• Re: FastTag, Deb Carnegie
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: FastTag, richard k wesson
• Topic/thread for Syntax Propellerheads?, JACK P. SHAW
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Topic/thread for Syntax Propellerheads?, Fred M Jacobson
• SGML--What does it mean to us?, Young Kim
• Looking for journal, Carolyn Kasky
• Syntax for Pretzel Logic statements, Ken d'Albenas
• German students looking for US internship, Brigitte E. Niggemeyer.
• Re: Technical vs. writing knowledge and masochists, Shannon Ford
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Technical vs. writing knowledge and masochists, Chuck Petch, Editor
  • Re[2]: Technical vs. writing knowledge and masochists, Bonni Graham
• GARBLED BIBLIOGRAPHY, Nick Lilly Tarleton State University
• Technical vs Writing - Article Details, Rahul Ravel
• Moving paper online, Line (L.C.) Bisson
• Disabilities, Joyce Hammock
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Disabilities, Tamye Lyles, Technical Writer--Martin Marietta Services Inc., 301 794-9600 x151
  • Re: Disabilities, Marian Harry-Young
  • Re: Disabilities, Steve Fouts
  • Re: Disabilities, Tamye Lyles, Technical Writer--Martin Marietta Services Inc., 301 794-9600 x151
• Judging of text delivered online, George Klima
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Judging of text delivered online, Marian Harry-Young
• Gender-biased language, Barbara Shwom
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Gender-biased language, Vicki Rosenzweig
  • Re: Gender-biased language, Andrew Shires
  • Re: Gender-biased language, Vicki Rosenzweig
  • Re: Gender-biased language, Andrew Shires
• Job Posting- Toronto, Ontar, Pat Anderson
• STC Online Documentation Competition Committee, Binion Amerson
• Freelance desktop publishing, Linda Wolf
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Freelance desktop publishing, Joe Fockler
  • Re: Freelance desktop publishing, Stefan Fielding-Isaacs
  • Re: Freelance desktop publishing, Alexandra Bernstein
  • Re: Freelance desktop publishing, Linda Wolf
• New Communications Skills?, Edwin Putkonen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: New Communications Skills?, Brian Daley
• (Fwd: *C&CD*) RE: (Fwd: *C&CD*) EFL students in a Tech communication course (*TECHWR-L*) (13) (*COMP.COMP*) (11), r0mill01
• Publish-It, Gordon Meyer
• Phoenix Jobs, LOWE
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Phoenix Jobs, Nancy Burns
  • Re: Phoenix Jobs, Susan Mitchell
  • Re[2]: Phoenix Jobs, Bonni Graham
• "Old" software, Dave Venzke
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: "Old" software, Eva Thury
• MA in English by correspondence?, Chuck Petch, Editor
• "Old" Software - contacts, Dave Venzke
• Expensive Software - CHEAP, LYNN PERRY
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Expensive Software - CHEAP, Brian Daley
  • Re: Expensive Software - CHEAP, 0505EN09
  • Re: Expensive Software - CHEAP, Stephen Bernhardt
  • Re: Expensive Software - CHEAP, 0505EN09
  • Re: Expensive Software - CHEAP, Kelly Hoffman
  • Re: Expensive Software - CHEAP, Charles Fisher
  • Re: Expensive Software - CHEAP, 0505EN09
  • Re: Expensive Software - CHEAP, Joyce Hammock
• Re: "Overpriced" software, Arthur Comings
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: "Overpriced" software, Stefan Fielding-Isaacs
  • Re: "Overpriced" software, Kelly Hoffman
  • Re: "Overpriced" software, Karen Steele
• Re: source edp in AZ and CO, Corinne Stefanick
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: source edp in AZ and CO, Alexandra Bernstein
  • Re: source edp in AZ and CO, Corinne Stefanick
  • Re: source edp in AZ and CO, Alexandra Bernstein
• Re: Eastern Standard Time, Susan Gallagher
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Eastern Standard Time, Chet W. Cady
  • Re: Eastern Standard Time, Kelly Hoffman
  • Re: Eastern Standard Time, Pat Anderson
  • Re: Eastern Standard Time, Nancy Burns
• "Old" and "Overpriced" Software, Steve Fouts
• garyd's libelous statements, Stefan Fielding-Isaacs
• Best Programs to Unlearn, Gotlieb Carl R1478C
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Best Programs to Unlearn, Chet W. Cady
  • Re[2]: Best Programs to Unlearn, Susan Gallagher
  • Re: Best Programs to Unlearn, DA Smith
• How stay grey?, Mark Levinson
• Nouns & pronouns, Mark Levinson
• Help Texts for Windows NT, George Klima
• Upgrading doesn't have to be immoral, Gregory=Kushmerek%AcctgMed%FIN
• Most Important Leason to Learn, Gary Dettmers
• academic/industry partnerships, Stephen Bernhardt
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: academic/industry partnerships, Alexandra Bernstein
  • Re: academic/industry partnerships, Brad Mehlenbacher
• Need help finding High School text for tech writing, Robert Delius Royar
• Personability, Mark Levinson
• Where are the cheap computers?, Mark Levinson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Where are the cheap computers?, Ad absurdum per aspera
  • Re: Where are the cheap computers?, Brian J. Dooley
• [no subject], Gregory=Kushmerek%AcctgMed%FIN
• Other list, Alexandra Bernstein
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Other list, Elwin McKellar
  • Re: Other list, Barbara Shwom
• Re: Writer list, MaryEllen Read
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Writer list, Marian Harry-Young
  • Re: Writer list, Bruce B. Harper
  • Re: Writer list, LaVonna Funkhouser
  • Re: Writer list, Joyce Hammock
• [no subject], Elliott C. Evans
• Usability -- page numbering ?, Guy Haas
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Usability -- page numbering ?, Chuck Petch, Editor
  • Re: Usability -- page numbering ?, Stephen Bernhardt
  • Re: Usability -- page numbering ?, Tim Slavin
• Re: Usability -- page numbering, Maria Townsley
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Usability -- page numbering, Kelly Hoffman
  • Re[2]: Usability -- page numbering, Bonni Graham
  • Re: Usability -- page numbering, Charles Fisher
  • Re: Usability -- page numbering, Kelly Hoffman
  • Re: Usability -- page numbering, Kelly Hoffman
  • Re: Usability -- page numbering, Fred M Jacobson
  • Re: Usability -- page numbering, Pam Tatge
  • Re: Usability -- page numbering, Karen Kay
  • Re: Usability -- page numbering, HOLLAND
  • Re: Usability -- page numbering, Paul Goble
  • Re: Usability -- page numbering, Vicki Rosenzweig
  • Re: Usability -- page numbering, Charles Fisher
  • Re: Usability -- page numbering, Yvonne deGraw
  • Re: Usability -- page numbering, Guy Haas
  • Re: Usability -- page numbering, Len Olszewski
  • Re: Usability -- page numbering, Gretchen Miller
• Rates for copy editing..., Jeff Youngstrom
• Re: Writer listker <MType 2> <MText `'> >, Elliott C. Evans
• Recent Errors, Elliott C. Evans
• page numbering -- internal references, LaVonna Funkhouser
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: page numbering -- internal references, Guy Haas
  • Re: page numbering -- internal references, Linda Rose
  • Re: page numbering -- internal references, Alexandra Bernstein
  • Re: page numbering -- internal references, Jim Grey
  • page numbering -- internal references, William C. Stolgitis
  • Re[2]: page numbering -- internal references, Bonni Graham
  • Re: page numbering -- internal references, Arthur Comings
• Looking for Tailhook Report, Z3BCG
• Re: English for Asian readers, Karen Kay
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • English for Asian readers, Margaret Gerard
  • Re: English for Asian readers, Paul Goble
  • English for Asian readers, Steven Owens
  • Re: English for Asian readers, Bonni Graham
  • Re: English for Asian readers, Mike Beyries
  • Re: English for Asian readers, Vicki Rosenzweig
  • Re: English for Asian readers, Ann Balaban
  • Re: English for Asian readers, Margaret Gerard
• Guidelines for Documenting Network Configurations, Lori Lathrop
• Scanned Images, Margaret Gerard
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Scanned Images, Margaret Gerard
• Notebook computer, Alexandra Bernstein
• Page numbering, Mark Levinson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Page numbering, HOLLAND
• notable notebook computer, Aldo Caputo
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: notable notebook computer, Kelly Hoffman
  • Re: notable notebook computer, Alexandra Bernstein
• "I, User" (re numbering schemes), Ken d'Albenas
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: "I, User" (re numbering schemes), Bonni Graham
  • Re: "I, User" (re numbering schemes), Paul Goble
  • Re: "I, User" (re numbering schemes), Arthur Comings
  • Re: "I, User" (re numbering schemes), Jim Grey
  • Re: "I, User" (re numbering schemes), Doug Montalbano
  • Re: "I, User" (re numbering schemes), Alexandra Bernstein
  • Re: "I, User" (re numbering schemes), Vicki Rosenzweig
• [no subject], Robert Hilden
• Re: Guerrilla Job Search Tactics, Shannon Ford
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re[2]: Guerrilla Job Search Tactics, Bonni Graham
• A question from Russia about funds in science, Vladimir
• Sorry, Bonni, Shannon Ford
• Indexers, George Klima
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Indexers, MaryEllen Read
  • Indexers, George Klima
• Sorry Shannon, Bonni Graham
• ISO 8879 AND ISO/IEC IS10744, Johanna Manning
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: ISO 8879 AND ISO/IEC IS10744, Johanna Manning
• Modular Documents, Mary A. Geisert
• Software version numbers, kendal stitzel
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Software version numbers, Ad absurdum per aspera
  • Re: Software version numbers, Len Olszewski
  • software version numbers, Susannah Skyer
  • Re: Software version numbers, Charles Fisher
  • Re: Software version numbers, Jim Grey
• Typography, Bonni Graham
• Need address for Ginny Redish, John Oriel
• Job Quest, Tamye Lyles, Technical Writer--Martin Marietta Services Inc., 301 794-9600 x151
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Job Quest, Bonni Graham
• You asked for it, Mark Levinson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: You asked for it, Chuck Petch, Editor
  • Re: You asked for it, Corinne Stefanick
  • Re[2]: You asked for it, Bonni Graham
  • Re: You asked for it, Alexandra Bernstein
  • Re: You asked for it, Nancy Burns
  • Re: You asked for it, Christy Yoder
  • Re: You asked for it, Fred Wersan
• RESUME SOFTWARE, L3
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: RESUME SOFTWARE, Marian Harry-Young
• Re: Technical -v- Technical Writing Expertise, Bonni Graham
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Technical -v- Technical Writing Expertise, Alun Whittaker
  • Re: Technical -v- Technical Writing Expertise, Janet Foltz
  • Re: Technical -v- Technical Writing Expertise, Alun Whittaker
  • Re: Technical -v- Technical Writing Expertise, Alun Whittaker
  • Re: Technical -v- Technical Writing Expertise, Janet Foltz
  • Re: Technical -v- Technical Writing Expertise, Len Olszewski
  • Re: Technical -v- Technical Writing Expertise, Shannon Ford
  • Technical -v- Technical Writing Expertise, Susannah Skyer
• Professional societies, Thomas Krueger
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Professional societies, Nancy Burns
• novice, RACHEL ELLIS
• STC head office, George Klima
• STC (Metro Baltimore chapter), Larry Kunz ((919) 254-6395)
• Seattle STC Info., 78witherspoo
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Seattle STC Info., Steve Fouts
• arts and humanities in info superhighway, LaVonna Funkhouser
• Math Tricks, Dave Venzke
• Worm Castings, Alun Whittaker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Worm Castings, Bonni Graham
• Re: Binary search (was numbering schemes), Fred M Jacobson
• Metaphors, Dominique de Vet
• Subscription request, Al Berg
• Is there a FAQ for this newsgroup?, Howard Kaikow
• Early Childhood Education, Vandy Estrella Reppert-Berry
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Early Childhood Education, George Klima
  • Re: Early Childhood Education, Vandy Estrella Reppert-Berry
  • Re: Early Childhood Education, Vandy Estrella Reppert-Berry
  • Re: Early Childhood Education, Vandy Estrella Reppert-Berry
• Technical review for correctness/clarity, Howard Kaikow
• FAQ, Howard Kaikow
• internet resources, Dickie Selfe
• MLA Handbook on-line, John Fulmer INET
• Tech Writing in Spanish?, Dan Romanchik
• Append, Merrell, K.W. (8-294-7813)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Append, Chuck Petch, Editor
  • Re: Append, Alexandra Bernstein
  • Re: Append, HELEN E. HODGSON
• FWD: SMTP delivery error, Charles Sides
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • FWD: SMTP delivery error, Charles Sides
  • FWD: SMTP delivery error, Charles Sides
  • FWD: SMTP delivery error, Charles Sides
• Re: Bad grammar on the list (was Append?), Steve Fouts
• Interactive Multimedia, Larry Kunz ((919) 254-6395)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Interactive Multimedia, Michael McClatchey
  • Re: Interactive Multimedia, Alun Whittaker
  • Re: Interactive Multimedia, Alun Whittaker
• Any rhetoricians on audience analysis?, Amy Dassie
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Any rhetoricians on audience analysis?, Jacobs Chris
• [no subject], Vandy Estrella Reppert-Berry
• Connotations of Typeface, K Angelucci
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Connotations of Typeface, Nancy Burns
• Re: Getting that degree (Append), Ken d'Albenas
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Getting that degree (Append), Karen Kay
  • Re: Getting that degree (Append), DA Smith
  • Re: Getting that degree (Append), Vicki Rosenzweig
• Experience and Company Management, Jacobs Chris
• Poor Grammar vs. Nettiquette Breach, Gregory=Kushmerek%AcctgMed%FIN
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Poor Grammar vs. Nettiquette Breach, Kim Ballard
  • Re: Poor Grammar vs. Nettiquette Breach, Joyce Hammock
• Re: good grad programs in tech comm, John Stonehouse
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • good grad programs in tech comm, Stephen Bernhardt
  • Re: good grad programs in tech comm, Brad Mehlenbacher
• Academic programs, Larry Kunz ((919) 254-6395)
• Re: Getting that degree, Steve Fouts
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Getting that degree, kendal stitzel
  • Re: Getting that degree, Vicki Rosenzweig
  • Re: Getting that degree, Jim Gifford
  • Re: Getting that degree, Len Olszewski
  • Re: Getting that degree, Beth C. Staats
  • Re: Getting that degree, Fred M Jacobson
  • Re: Getting that degree, Alexandra Bernstein
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE #153, 29 Nov 93, Ad absurdum per aspera
• Graduate Programs, Alexander Friedlander
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Graduate Programs, Joyce Hammock
• SUBSCRIBE TECHWR-L Suzanne LeBlanc, Leblanc, Suzanne R
• Re: Typeface/Let's Make it Clear (?), kendal stitzel
• Re: Nettiquette Breach -v- Common Politeness, Alun Whittaker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re[2]: Nettiquette Breach -v- Common Politeness, Bonni Graham
• Jack of all trades, master of none?, Michael McClatchey
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Jack of all trades, master of none?, Alun Whittaker
• Re: style checker, Bonni Graham
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • style checker, Jim Porter
  • Re: style checker, Mike Beyries
  • Re: Style Checker, lathropl
• Degrees and money, Beth C. Staats
• Grad Programs, Jolene Galegher
• Documentation plan?, Karen Kay
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Documentation plan?, Len Olszewski
  • Re: Documentation plan?, Karen Kay
  • Documentation plan?, lathropl
  • Re: Documentation plan?, Brad Mehlenbacher
  • Re: Documentation plan?, Fred M Jacobson
• for NANCY BURNS: "Let's make it clear" and Copyright, Randy Allen Harris
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: for NANCY BURNS: "Let's make it clear" and Copyright, Karen Kay
• Spelling and grammar in this list, LaVonna Funkhouser
• What about BA/BSc-level tech comm. programs?, Patrick O'Connell
• Msg. to the Selfes, Liz Babcock
• [no subject], Unknown
• [no subject], Unknown
• [no subject], Unknown
• [no subject], Unknown
• [no subject], Unknown
• [no subject], Unknown

---

Thread Index (Switch to Author Index)

---

---

---