TechWhirl Sponsors

---

 

Threaded TECHWR-L Mailing List Archive December 1994

---

1212 messages

Thread Index (Switch to Author Index)

---

• Enjoy. Not tech writing., genie-postmaster
• Re: Book Master Information Wanted, Gabe Goldberg
• Production Editor Positions, Anni Golding
• Long post on passive voice, genie-postmaster
• Re: another passive voice question, genie-postmaster
• Moving right along, genie-postmaster
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Moving right along, Timothy Schablin
• Is passive voice ever OK?, genie-postmaster
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Is passive voice ever OK?, Ian White
• Re: Shannon-Weaver Model, genie-postmaster
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Shannon-Weaver Model, Alex Buczek
• HEY LIST MANAGER, Race, Paul
• Re: women and men (was Re: Hey, take it eas, dagmar
• I DON'T CARE. WAS RE: he/she, Race, Paul
• Re: Online Help Help, cathy pacza
• Copyediting tests for employment, Katharine Y. Flight
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Copyediting tests for employment, WandaJane Phillips
  • Re: Copyediting tests for employment, genie-postmaster
  • Re: Copyediting tests for employment, Jan Boomsliter
• Re: Re[2]: generic "he", Marianne Adams
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Re[2]: generic "he", Vicki Rosenzweig
  • Re[4]: generic "he", Virginia L. Krenn
  • Re: Re[2]: generic "he", Matt Hicks
  • Re: Re[2]: generic "he", Doug, Data Librarian at Ext 4225
  • Re: Re[2]: generic "he", Marianne Adams
  • Re: Re[4]: generic "he", Susan Fowler
  • generic "he", David Blyth @second
• Inclusion, Richard Mateosian
• Re: Jobs Future for Technical Communication, Marianne Adams
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Jobs Future for Technical Communication, Richard Lippincott
  • Re: Jobs Future for Technical Communication, USA::MU17692
  • Re: Jobs Future for Technical Communication, Laurie Rubin
• Powerful documentation tool needed, Brown, Mordechai
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Powerful documentation tool needed, Jan Boomsliter
  • Re: Powerful documentation tool needed, Susan W. Gallagher
  • Re: Powerful documentation tool needed, Jan Bates
• Amram Hakohen's message, Brown, Mordechai
• Re: Job Futures for Tech Writing, JohnBrin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Job Futures for Tech Writing, USA::MU17692
  • Re: Job Futures for Tech Writing, Gwen Gall
  • Re: Job Futures for Tech Writing, Rose Wilcox
  • Re: Job Futures for Tech Writing, jlee
  • Re: Job Futures for Tech Writing, Romay Jean Sitze
  • Re: Job Futures for Tech Writing, Laurie Rubin
  • Re: Job Futures for Tech Writing, Doug, Data Librarian at Ext 4225
  • Job Futures for Tech Writing, Larry Kunz ((919) 254-6395)
  • Re: Job Futures for Tech Writing, Elna . Tymes
  • Re: Job Futures for Tech Writing -Reply, Doug, Data Librarian at Ext 4225
  • Re: Job Futures for Tech Writing -Reply, Bonni J. Graham
  • Re: Job Futures for Tech Writing -Reply, Doug, Data Librarian at Ext 4225
  • job futures for tech writing, Caryn Rizell
  • Re: Job Futures for Tech Writing -Reply, Bonni J. Graham
  • Re: Job Futures for Tech Writing -Reply, genie-postmaster
• New WWW page on science and environmental writing, Bonnie Nestor (NESTORM -at- FEDC04 -dot- FED -dot- ORNL -dot- GOV
• Fun with the Pentium Bug!, Binion Amerson
• Re: Standards of Conduct doc, burgamw1
• Re: What else to tech. communicators do?, saphyre
• Re: Sie/hir, saphyre
• Job Futures in Technical Communication, USA::MU17692
• New Indexing/Marker Control Tool for FrameMaker Users, Frank Stearns
• Re: The Pentium 90 Chip, Arlen P. Walker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • The Pentium 90 Chip, Mike Melby
  • Re: The Pentium 90 Chip, Steve Fouts
  • Re: The Pentium 90 Chip, Sean O'Donnell-Brown
• Re: On Line Documents?, Mary Deaton
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: On Line Documents?, Killer of Trees
  • Re: On Line Documents?, Louise M &/Or Jim N
• Re: Disciplines within Tech Comm, HiMark
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Disciplines within Tech Comm, Joseph J Little
  • Re: Disciplines within Tech Comm, Robert E. Allen
  • Disciplines within Tech Comm, Regina Doorlay
  • Re: Disciplines within Tech Comm, jcurran
  • Re: Disciplines within Tech Comm, JohnBrin
• "killer"?, Matt Hicks
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: "killer"?, Arthur Comings
  • Re: "killer"?, Arlen P. Walker
• Windows Screen Captures, Nora Merhar
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Windows Screen Captures, Joyce & Cordell Woods
  • Re: Windows Screen Captures, Will Kelly
  • Windows Screen Captures, Victoria Mathews
  • Re: Windows Screen Captures, Romay Jean Sitze
  • Re: Windows Screen Captures, Susan W. Gallagher
  • Re: Windows Screen Captures, Marianne Adams
  • Re: Windows Screen Captures, Romay Jean Sitze
  • Windows screen captures, Mark Levinson
• C&IC PIC of STC, Joyce & Cordell Woods
• "Brilliant" information, Liz Babcock
• Re: Contract writing (was Job Futures for Tech Writing), Gwen Gall
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Contract writing (was Job Futures for Tech Writing), Bonni J. Graham
  • Re: Contract writing (was Job Futures for Tech Writing), CJBenz
• [no subject], Jan Boomsliter
• Editing Address Please...., Harris, Russ [MV]
• Japanese pronouns, Karen Kay
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Japanese pronouns, Fenella Saunders
  • Re: Japanese pronouns, Karen Kay
  • Re: Japanese pronouns, genie-postmaster
  • Re: Japanese pronouns, genie-postmaster
• Re: He/she, mpriestley
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: He/she, Karen Kay
  • Re: He/she, mpriestley
  • Re: He/she, Sandy, Corinne
  • Re: He/she, Nancy Hayes
• Re: STC-Tucson Meeting Notice, Carl Gotlieb
• Change E-mail Address, Chiu-Fang Chen
• Powerful documentation to, Marilynne Smith
• Script to Wordperfect conversion, QMS Account
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Script to Wordperfect conversion, William J. Hartzer
  • Re: Script to Wordperfect conversion, Chet Ensign
  • Script to WordPerfect Conversion, Watson Laughton
  • Script to WordPerfect Conversion, genie-postmaster
• Powerful documentation tool need, Debby Moller
• New Indexing/Marker Control Tool, Debby Moller
• Re: Powerful documentation tool, Debby Moller
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Powerful documentation tool, Debby Moller
  • Re: Powerful documentation tool, Steve Fouts
• killer apps, Cynthia Schwartz
• RoboHelp Advice, Eady, Sandra
• Contractors vs employees. Was: Re: Jobs Future for Technical Communication, Race, Paul
• I give. Life's too short., Race, Paul
• Re: quick Word question about ASCII text, CJBenz
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: quick Word question about ASCII text, Susan W. Gallagher
• Re: Powerful documentation tool (fwd), Killer of Trees
• tech writing future, Chris Hester
• job future of tech writing, Chris Hester
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: job future of tech writing, Robert E. Allen
• Document control, Debbie Molinaro
• New TW graduates..., Tina Sansom
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: New TW graduates..., Nora Merhar
  • Re: New TW graduates..., Romay Jean Sitze
• [Re]: More passive voice questions, Watson Laughton
• Seminars, Valarie
• Pronouns, Karen Kay
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Pronouns, mpriestley
• Re: Contractors vs employees. Was: Re: Jobs Future for Technical, Susan W. Gallagher
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Contractors vs employees. Was: Re: Jobs Future for Technical, Bonni J. Graham
• Translation into Russian, Cyrillic fonts, etc., David Hancock
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Translation into Russian, Cyrillic fonts, etc., David Dubin
• Window Screen Captures, David Blyth @second
• Setting a New Goal, Susan W. Gallagher
• Re: using 'chair', Kat Nagel
• Line spacing in bullet li, Keith Soltys
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Line spacing in bullet li, Christopher M. Fisher
  • Re: Line spacing in bullet li, Ian White
  • Re: Line spacing in bullet li, Romay Jean Sitze
  • Re: Line spacing in bullet li, Rose Wilcox
  • Re: Line spacing in bullet li, Robert E. Allen
• Job offer for Project Managers, Northern NJ, censign
• Re: WHAT ELSE TO T, Gregg Roberts
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: WHAT ELSE TO T, Elaine Winters
  • Re: WHAT ELSE TO T, Gregg Roberts
  • Re: WHAT ELSE TO T, genie-postmaster
  • Re: WHAT ELSE TO T, Sandy, Corinne
• Re: Jobs Future for Techn, Marilynne Smith
• Re: Contract writing (was, Marilynne Smith
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Contract writing (was, genie-postmaster
• Re: Book Master Replies, Marilynne Smith
• Re: Job Futures for Tech, Marilynne Smith
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Job Futures for Tech, Barb Philbrick
• Computer Dictionary, Edunetics
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Computer Dictionary, Joyce & Cordell Woods
  • Re: Computer Dictionary, mpriestley
  • Re: Computer Dictionary, Mean Green Dancing Machine
• Human performance evaluation and analysis, JohnBrin
• wanted:short courses for engineers info, Ken Zuroski
• Re: Computer Glossary, John C. Reynolds, III
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Computer Glossary, genie-postmaster
• MSWord problem, Margaret Redding
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: MSWord problem, Valerie Archambeau
  • MSWord problem, Virginia L. Krenn
  • MSWord problem, William J. Hartzer
  • Re: MSWord problem, John Russell
  • MSWord problem, genie-postmaster
  • Re: MSWord problem, genie-postmaster
  • Re: MSWord problem, Arlen P. Walker
  • Re: MSWord problem, harold (h.o.n.) floysvik
  • Re: MSWord problem, Glen Accardo
• Line Spacing in Bullet Lists, QMS Account
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Line spacing in bullet lists, mrw.EMAIL
  • Re: Line spacing in bullet lists, mpriestley
  • Re[2]: Line spacing in bullet lists, Jay Cherniak
  • Re: Line spacing in bullet lists, genie-postmaster
  • Re: Line spacing in bullet lists, Jan Boomsliter
• cmsg cancel <3btsqh$q89 -at- insosf1 -dot- infonet -dot- net>, Floyd Johnson
• mailist, BARAKAJC
• Re: Use of Passive Voice, Joseph J Little
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Use of Passive Voice, genie-postmaster
• Gut Reactions to SGML, Kate Morrow
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Gut Reactions to SGML, Chet Ensign
  • Re: Gut Reactions to SGML, SuePStewrt
  • Re: Gut Reactions to SGML, Kirk Foster
  • Re: Gut Reactions to SGML, genie-postmaster
  • Re: Gut Reactions to SGML, William J. Hartzer
  • Re: Gut Reactions to SGML, William J. Hartzer
  • Re: Gut Reactions to SGML, Chet Ensign
• Thanks for Curriculum Info, Sarah Bane
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Thanks for Curriculum Info, genie-postmaster
• Tutorial Generating Software, Phil Hellerman
• Re: Script to Wordperfect conv., William J. Hartzer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Script to Wordperfect conv., William J. Hartzer
  • Re: Script to Wordperfect conv., William J. Hartzer
• copyright, Timothy Schablin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • copyright, Dave L. Meek's User Account
  • Re: copyright, PICKETT-HARNER, Molly
  • Re: Copyright, Tate-Stratton, Nikki A
  • Copyright, Mark Levinson
  • Re: Copyright, Vicki Rosenzweig
  • Re: copyright, Jan Boomsliter
  • Re: copyright, Jan Boomsliter
  • Re: Copyright, genie-postmaster
  • Re: copyright, Dave L. Meek's User Account
  • Re: copyright, genie-postmaster
  • Re: copyright, genie-postmaster
  • Re: copyright, genie-postmaster
  • Re: Copyright, Dave L. Meek's User Account
  • Re: Copyright, Amber J. Gray
• Re: McGraw-Hill Dictionary, Judith Hammeran
• Liability Insurance for Contractors?, Cathy Godwin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Liability Insurance for Contractors?, Jan Boomsliter
  • Re: Liability Insurance for Contractors?, genie-postmaster
• Re: Contractors vs employees. Was: Re: Jobs Future for Technical, Elna . Tymes
• [no subject], Gendreau Simon
• Graphics, Bonni J. Graham
• POSSIBLE VIRUS ALERT, Charles Fisher
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: POSSIBLE VIRUS ALERT, Arlen P. Walker
  • Re: POSSIBLE VIRUS ALERT, Gwen Gall
  • POSSIBLE VIRUS ALERT, Gwen Barnes
  • Re: POSSIBLE VIRUS ALERT, Gwen Gall
  • POSSIBLE VIRUS ALERT, genie-postmaster
  • Re: POSSIBLE VIRUS ALERT, genie-postmaster
  • Re: POSSIBLE VIRUS ALERT, CJBenz
• Forwarded: E-mail virus, Tammy Williams
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Forwarded: E-mail virus, Dave L. Meek's User Account
  • Forwarded: E-mail virus, genie-postmaster
• Workshops for On-the-Job Writers, Kevin S. Wilson
• EMAIL? E-mail? email?, Ed Hoornaert
• Re: Line spacing in bulleted lists, Jay Mead
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Line spacing in bulleted lists, mpriestley
  • Re: Line spacing in bulleted lists, Jan Boomsliter
  • Re: Line spacing in bulleted lists, genie-postmaster
• Re: passive voice, Jay Cherniak
• TEST - PLEASE IGNORE, Charles Fisher
• Re: Liability Insurance for Cont, Kevin S. Wilson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Liability Insurance for Cont, Karen Kay
  • Re: Liability Insurance for Cont, Gwen Gall
  • Re: Liability Insurance for Cont, Romay Jean Sitze
  • Re: Liability Insurance for Cont, genie-postmaster
• Job Opening: Technical Writer, Kim Ferri 415-428-2710
• SGML, Mark Levinson
• copyright & trademark, Kelly Kremin
• Bad, but not a virus, Mark Levinson
• Tech Comm Short Courses for Engineers, George F. Hayhoe III
• Meeting Notice: Twin Cities Windows Help Interest Group, Matt Abe
• Virtues and Vulnerabilities of SGML, George F. Hayhoe III
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Virtues and Vulnerabilities of SGML, Chet Ensign
• Contractor Job - Norwood, MA, Weinberg, Rebecca
• Translation..., Regina Doorlay
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Translation..., Karen Kay
  • Re: Translation..., genie-postmaster
• "GUI" REPLIES, Gregg Roberts
• VIRUSES, Gregg Roberts
• Fwd: Taxonomy of Operating Systems (humour), Gwen Gall
• Minimalist survey, logendra (l.) naidoo
• A Definition of Tech Comm, Joseph J Little
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: A Definition of Tech Comm, Joseph J Little
  • A Definition of Tech Comm, genie-postmaster
  • Re: A Definition of Tech Comm, genie-postmaster
  • Re: A Definition of Tech Comm, Stuart Selber
  • Re: A Definition of Tech Comm, Joseph J Little
• STC Web Site, Joseph J Little
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: STC Web Site, Ad absurdum per aspera
  • Re: STC Web Site, Gregk
  • STC Web Site, Michael Lairson
• U of Wash, Joseph J Little
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • U of Wash, genie-postmaster
  • Re: U of Wash, WandaJane Phillips
• Key Words for Tech Comm, LaVonna Funkhouser
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Key Words for Tech Comm, Karen Kay
  • Re: Key Words for Tech Comm, Laurie Rubin
• Summary--FrameMaker on UNIX Workstations--Part I of II (long), Binion Amerson
• Summary--FrameMaker on UNIX Workstations--Part II of II (long), Binion Amerson
• Re: Script-to-WP Conversion, William J. Hartzer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Script-to-WP Conversion, Steve Read
  • Re: Script-to-WP Conversion, genie-postmaster
  • fw:Re: Re: Script-to-WP Conversion, lara (l.) swift
• Re: Technical author questionnaire, Steve Delanghe
• Re: MSWord problem -- Resent?, Valerie Archambeau
• Use of K (thousand) and M (million), Montgomery, Kevin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Use of K (thousand) and M (million), Richard Lippincott
  • Re: Use of K (thousand) and M (million), Matt Hicks
  • Re: Use of K (thousand) and M (million), usrhr.US
  • Re: Use of K (thousand) and M (million), John M. Gear
  • Re: Use of K (thousand) and M (million), Jan Boomsliter
  • Re: Use of K (thousand) and M (million), Susan W. Gallagher
  • Re: Use of K (thousand) and M (million), genie-postmaster
  • Re: Use of K (thousand) and M (million), genie-postmaster
  • Re: Use of K (thousand) and M (million), ellen trevarthen
  • Re: Use of K (thousand) and M (million), Brett E Lee
  • Re[2]: Use of K (thousand) and M (million), Virginia L. Krenn
• Re: HTML editor for Mac, kathy barreto
• Tweaking the bullet-spacing, Mark Levinson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Tweaking the bullet-spacing, genie-postmaster
• Re: contract insurance, Brian Berry
• Virus and List Stuff, Eric J. Ray
• Re: Definition of Sci/Tech Commun, Bonnie Nestor (NESTORM -at- FEDC04 -dot- FED -dot- ORNL -dot- GOV
• AOL Says "Good Time" Virus Not Found..., Laurie Rubin
• confused numbers, Matt Hicks
• Liability Insurance for Contractors -- Thanks, Cathy Godwin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Liability Insurance for Contractors -- Thanks, Robert W. Jones
  • Liability Insurance for Contractors -- Thanks, genie-postmaster
• Microsoft mail internet access?? Help???, John Eldard
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Microsoft mail internet access?? Help???, Rose Wilcox
  • Re: Microsoft mail internet access?? Help???, genie-postmaster
  • Re: Microsoft mail internet access?? Help???, JOHNSON, VALORA
  • Re: Microsoft mail internet access?? Help???, Brown, David W [RV]
  • Re: Microsoft mail internet access?? Help???, genie-postmaster
• STC soundviews newsletter, Timothy Schablin
• argument!!, Timothy Schablin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: argument!!, Virginia L. Krenn
  • Re: argument!!, Matt Hicks
  • Re: argument!!, Dan Glovier
  • Re: argument!!, Massi, Jerri
  • Re: argument!!, Karen Kay
  • Re: argument!!, SuePStewrt
  • Re: argument!!, genie-postmaster
  • Re: argument!!, Sandy, Corinne
  • Re: argument!!, Laurie Rubin
  • Re: argument!!, Massi, Jerri
  • Re: argument!!, Erich J. Horn
  • Re: argument!!, genie-postmaster
• TW Grad Programs - Atlanta, Sandy, Corinne
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • TW Grad Programs - Atlanta, genie-postmaster
  • Re: TW Grad Programs - Atlanta, JOHNSON, VALORA
• Worst case scenarios, David Blyth @second
• minimalist design, Sherri Hall
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • minimalist design, genie-postmaster
• Help!, Laurie Rubin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Help!, Caryn Rizell
  • Re: Help!, Sandy, Corinne
  • Re: Help!, harold (h.o.n.) floysvik
  • Re: Help!, genie-postmaster
• seeking html/web training, Barbara Rigg-Healy
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: seeking html/web training, Stessa Cohen
• Re: argument!! (Humor), Valerie Archambeau
• Full-time Tech Writing Position Available, Margaret Thomas
• Corel/Ventura 5.0, Weatbrook, Catherine
• redundancy, Peter W Praetorius
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: redundancy, Susan W. Gallagher
  • Re: redundancy, Christopher Miller
  • Re: redundancy, Sandy, Corinne
  • Re: redundancy, Arlen P. Walker
  • Re: redundancy, mrw.EMAIL
  • Re: redundancy, Laurie Rubin
  • Re: redundancy, harold (h.o.n.) floysvik
  • Re: redundancy, Romay Jean Sitze
  • Re[2]: redundancy, Arlen P. Walker
  • Re: redundancy, Marc Santacroce
  • Re: redundancy, Sally Marquigny
  • Re: redundancy, genie-postmaster
  • Re: redundancy, Marianne Adams
  • Re: redundancy, ellen trevarthen
• Good Times! - CIAC Advisory concerning the email virus hoax, Montgomery, Kevin
• WEISS REFERENCE, Gregg Roberts
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: WEISS REFERENCE, Carl Gotlieb
• Reference books, Howard Kaikow
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Reference books, John Lee Bumgarner
• Apply/update, Richard Mateosian
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Apply/update, Laurie Rubin
  • Re: Apply/update, Richard Mateosian
  • Re: Apply/update, Laurie Rubin
  • Re: Apply/update, Jan Bates
  • Re: Apply/update, Susan W. Gallagher
  • Re: Apply/update, genie-postmaster
• Connected millions, Richard Mateosian
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Connected millions, Laurie Rubin
  • Re: Connected millions, Massi, Jerri
  • Re: Connected millions, Elna . Tymes
  • Re: Connected millions, Laurie Rubin
  • Re: Connected millions, Jan Boomsliter
  • Re: Connected millions, Gwen Gall
• Serif PagePlus Intro, Anybody have it?, Steve Owens
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Serif PagePlus Intro, Anybody have it?, Richard Lippincott
  • Re: Serif PagePlus Intro, Anybody have it?, genie-postmaster
• insert pages for updating manuals, Kelly Kremin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: insert pages for updating manuals, usrhr.US
  • Re: insert pages for updating manuals, Jan Boomsliter
  • Re: insert pages for updating manuals, Randall Raemon
• TECHWR-L Digest - 6 Dec 1994 to 7 Dec 1994, genie-postmaster
• Word use: Express/ed, Gwen Gall
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Word use: Express/ed, Sandy, Corinne
  • Re: Word use: Express/ed, Dan Glovier
  • Word use: Express/ed, William J. Hartzer
  • Re: Word use: Express/ed, Jan Boomsliter
  • Re: Word use: Express/ed, KnoxML1
• ATA100 info, Gendreau Simon
• Re: Virus, mrw.EMAIL
• ANSI/IEEE defs of k, K, M, Debbie Campbell
• SI units (Was: Use of K and M), Bonnie Nestor (NESTORM -at- FEDC04 -dot- FED -dot- ORNL -dot- GOV
• Cyberleaf, Frank Saucier
• "Millions of people from every continent are connected to it, Vollbach, Elizabeth
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: "Millions of people from every continent are connected to it, Timothy Schablin
• (U) re: Help!, Victoria Mathews
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • (U) re: Help!, genie-postmaster
• Liability insurance for contractors, Cathy Godwin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Liability insurance for contractors, Robert W. Jones
  • Re: Liability insurance for contractors, Jan Boomsliter
  • Re: Liability insurance for contractors, mary headley
  • Re: Liability insurance for contractors, Robert W. Jones
  • Re: Liability insurance for contractors, Karen Kay
  • Re: Liability insurance for contractors, Bonni J. Graham
• Standard abbreviations, Joyce & Cordell Woods
• k=1000 or k=1024, Joyce & Cordell Woods
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • k=1000 or k=1024, genie-postmaster
• Ending with a preposition, Richard Mateosian
• Followup on Update issue, Laurie Rubin
• Re: redundancy/hot coffe, etc., Joe Fockler
• Re: argument!! (fwd), Timothy Schablin
• Warning: Long Microsoft Humour Posting (Irreverent/Irrelevant), Gwen Gall
• poorly worded ads (humor), John Russell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • poorly worded ads (humor), genie-postmaster
• Key Words for TechComm, Pt. 2, LaVonna Funkhouser
• Year 2000, Mark Sanders
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Year 2000, Mike Mcgraw
  • Re: Year 2000, Susan W. Gallagher
  • Re: Year 2000, genie-postmaster
  • Re: Year 2000, Sandy, Corinne
  • Re: Year 2000, Doug, Data Librarian at Ext 4225
  • Re: Year 2000, Laurie Rubin
  • Year 2000, USA::MU17692
  • Re: Year 2000, Glen Accardo
  • Re: Year 2000, Rose Wilcox
  • Re: Year 2000, Heli Roosild
  • Re: Year 2000, Ray Bruman
  • Re: Year 2000, Laurie Rubin
  • Re: Year 2000, Eady, Sandra
  • Re: Year 2000, Doug, Data Librarian at Ext 4225
  • Year 2000, Summers, Jan
  • Re: Year 2000, Doug, Data Librarian at Ext 4225
  • Re: Year 2000, genie-postmaster
• Resume for the Outsourced Employee, LaVonna Funkhouser
• Re: prepositions (was Connected millions), Glen Accardo
• STC DC Chapter December Meeting, Charles Fisher
• User Preferences -- Help Please, Eric J. Ray
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: User Preferences -- Help Please, Jan Bates
• Further Update Followup, Laurie Rubin
• Tech. Writing Position Available, Yves C. Munger, p.eng., M.Sc.
• Re: Job Futures-Who are We?, Jill Buss
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Job Futures-Who are We?, Richard Lippincott
• $100K???????????, William J. Hartzer
• Redistribution: Minimalist survey, logendra (l.) naidoo
• k vs. K, Frank Saucier
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • k vs. K, genie-postmaster
• MSWORD Problem (the solution), WARDEN
• TECHWR-L Digest - 5 Dec 1994 to 6 Dec 1994, genie-postmaster
• MS-Project, etc. to manage techwriting, Phil Block
• blah blah "to", Mark Levinson
• Re: prepositions (was Connected millions, Tim Pera
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: prepositions (was Connected millions, KnoxML1
  • Re: prepositions (was Connected millions, genie-postmaster
  • Re: prepositions (was Connected millions, Massi, Jerri
• Paper Prices Up 30% in USA, Johanna Manning
• PagePlus Intro, Fred Wersan
• Re: Word use: Express/ed (Absurdity), Arlen P. Walker
• Lotus Notes Maillist?, usrhr.US
• RFI: IBM doc manual, arthur zachai
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: RFI: IBM doc manual, Steve Delanghe
• Productivity Guidline, Ralph Clark
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Productivity Guidline, Susan W. Gallagher
  • Re: Productivity Guidline, Steve Delanghe
• PAPER PRICES RISIN, Gregg Roberts
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: PAPER PRICES RISIN, Romay Jean Sitze
• Re: prepositions, mpriestley
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Prepositions, Glenn Crumpley
  • Re: prepositions, Sally Marquigny
  • prepositions, David Blyth @second
  • Re: prepositions, Massi, Jerri
  • Re: prepositions, Janet Valade
  • Prepositions, Jay Cherniak
  • Re: Prepositions, Arlen_P_Walker%BG-HDQTRS
• Re: Word use: Express/ed (Absurd, William J. Hartzer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re[2]: Word use: Express/ed (Absurd, Barb Miller
  • Re[2]: Word use: Express/ed (Absurd, Carma C Allen
  • Re: Word use: Express/ed (Absurd, Laura Johnson
• MSWORD PROB, William J. Hartzer
• STC Phoenix Chapter December Meeting, Giovanna
• Re: PAPER PRICES RISING, Steve Fouts
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: PAPER PRICES RISING, Dianne Driskell
• None, Torrance Brooksfuller
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • None, genie-postmaster
• Re[2]: Express (Abusrdity escalated), Arlen P. Walker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Re[2]: Express (Abusrdity escalated), SuePStewrt
• Re: TECHWR-L Digest - 5 Dec 1994 to 6 Dec 1994Information Mapping, Sushil Oswal
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: TECHWR-L Digest - 5 Dec 1994 to 6 Dec 1994Information Mapping, Sandy, Corinne
  • Re: TECHWR-L Digest - 5 Dec 1994 to 6 Dec 1994Information Mapping, Steve Delanghe
• Express permission, KnoxML1
• Arlen's right (was Word use: Express/ed (Absurd...)), Matt Hicks
• Re: Update/apply/synchronize, Laurie Rubin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Update/apply/synchronize, Richard Lippincott
  • Re: Update/apply/synchronize, genie-postmaster
• Re 2]: Word use: Express/ed (Abs, William J. Hartzer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Re 2]: Word use: Express/ed (Abs, K. Edgcombe
• Re: Job Titles, Sally Marquigny
• Re: Word use: Express/ed (You have no idea what you're talking about), Sandy, Corinne
• Project Planning Software, thoyt -at- qualcomm -dot- com
• Denver/Boulder Area Party, Kathleen Nosbisch
• technical writers for computer industry, Sushil Oswal
• having or to have, Gretchen Toth
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: having or to have, Rose Wilcox
  • Re: having or to have, Arlen P. Walker
  • Re: having or to have, Valerie Archambeau
• Translation, Karen Kay
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Translation, Richard Lippincott
  • Re: Translation, Karen Kay
• Use of M, Christopher Miller
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Use of M, John Fulton
  • Re: Use of M, Ray Bruman
• WordPerfect 6.1 for Windows, Amber J. Gray
• Express(ed), Summers, Jan
• Dates, Richard Mateosian
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Dates, Karen Kay
  • Re: Dates, Less is more.
  • Re: Dates, Sally Marquigny
• bibliography generation software, Sushil Oswal
• Date traps (was: Year 2000), SANDRA CHARKER
• See 11364, Steve Delanghe
• Re: structured writing (Information Mapping), Jerre Beal (jbeal)
• editing challenge (humor), Darcey Harding
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: editing challenge (humor), Arlen P. Walker
• Test Only-sorry, Shelly LaRock
• genie postmaster messages, Fenella Saunders
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: genie postmaster messages, Randall Raemon
  • genie postmaster messages, Marilynne Smith
• Re: Copyrights, QMS Account
• Passive and Active Voice, Melissa J Skusa
• "M" as thousand, Mark Levinson
• Quick-fix doc manual, Mark Levinson
• I18N & L10N, Debby Moller
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: I18N & L10N, Vicki Rosenzweig
  • Re: I18N & L10N, Harris, Russ [MV]
  • Re: I18N & L10N, Doug, Data Librarian at Ext 4225
  • Re: I18N & L10N, Ray Bruman
  • Re: I18N & L10N, Susan Fowler
• I Dream of Genie, George F. Hayhoe III
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: I Dream of Genie, Dianne Driskell
  • Re: I Dream of Genie, Joe Fockler
  • Re: I Dream of Genie, Marilynne Smith
• Project Management Software, George F. Hayhoe III
• Corel Ventura 5 Update, George F. Hayhoe III
• Make sense?, Eric J. Ray
• Aaarrggg! When Will This Stop????, Watson Laughton
• Re: Word use: Express/ed (You ha, William J. Hartzer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Word use: Express/ed (You ha, William J. Hartzer
  • Re: Word use: Express/ed (You ha, Sally Marquigny
• TW Jobs in Atlanta Area, Sandy, Corinne
• Newsgroup?, Kirstin Mercer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Newsgroup?, Randall Raemon
• Using MS Project for doc groups, Faith Weber
• Roman numerals, Mark Levinson
• Roman page numbers for front matter, Richard Mateosian
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Roman page numbers for front matter, Kelly Hoffman
  • Re: Roman page numbers for front matter, Ray Bruman
• Court Ordered Liquidation - Computer Memory - CPU's & DSK Drives, LIONEL GOLDBERG
• Faith Weber's Questions on MS Project, George F. Hayhoe III
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Faith Weber's Questions on MS Project, Rose Wilcox
• Cultural lesson, Richard Lippincott
• Re: Word use/ Express(ed) (You ha, Watson Laughton
• Re: Style Guide Products, Chet Ensign
• Southeast FLA STC?, William J. Hartzer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Southeast FLA STC?, Marc Santacroce
• Re: STATUS 5 messages, Andy Finkenstadt
• SGML's Virtues and Vulnerabilities (again), George F. Hayhoe III
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: SGML's Virtues and Vulnerabilities (again), Chet Ensign
• l18N, PICKETT-HARNER, Molly
• Re: occupational outlook handbook, Christopher M. Fisher
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • occupational outlook handbook, William J. Hartzer
  • Re: occupational outlook handbook, Susan W. Gallagher
  • Re: occupational outlook handbook, Glen Accardo
  • Re: occupational outlook handbook, Sally Marquigny
  • occupational outlook handbook -Reply, Lisa Baker
• [MASS] Next FUNNE Meeting information..., Paul Brady 5797
• unsubscribe!!, Imtiaz Haiyoom
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: unsubscribe!!, Sandy, Corinne
• Question on the list, Sue Heim
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Question on the list, Susan W. Gallagher
  • Re[2]: Question on the list, Virginia L. Krenn
  • Re: Question on the list, Sandy, Corinne
• a job as editor, Sherri Hall
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: a job as editor, Jan Boomsliter
  • Re: a job as editor, Robert Busch
  • Re: a job as editor, Marc Santacroce
  • Re: a job as editor, Marc Santacroce
  • Re: a job as editor, Lori Lathrop
  • a job as editor -Reply, Lisa Baker
• Salary Question, Kimberly Wiederman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Salary Question, Katie Henry x3432
  • Re: Salary Question, Marc Santacroce
  • Re: Salary Question, Jan Boomsliter
  • Re: Salary Question, Susan W. Gallagher
  • Re: Salary Question, Doug, Data Librarian at Ext 4225
  • Re: salary question, lara (l.) swift
  • Re: Salary Question, Michael LaTorra
• Re: Bill Hartzer's flame(s), Heli Roosild
• pagemaker classes, Kim Ferri 415-428-2710
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: pagemaker classes, Marc Santacroce
• ARRRRRGGGGHHHHHH!, Richard Mateosian
• on-line viewers for WORD, Jill Leannah
• Please incorporate instructions on how to unsubscribe, Robert Whitehead
• Re: alot, Gwen Gall
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: alot, Virginia L. Krenn
  • Re: alot, Nora Merhar
  • Re: alot, Romay Jean Sitze
  • Re[2]: alot, Virginia L. Krenn
• AOL VIRUS IS A HOAX - Pass it On, Frank Saucier
• Fwd: Clipart, Gwen Gall
• two-word verbs vs. prepositions, Debbie Campbell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: two-word verbs vs. prepositions, Karen Kay
  • Re: two-word verbs vs. prepositions, Ray Bruman
• flame vs. correction, PICKETT-HARNER, Molly
• user vs. user's, Kelly Kremin
• Professional Liability Insurance for Contract Writers, Cathy Godwin
• Using mistakes as shorthand, Arthur Comings
• Date trivia, Less is more.
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Date trivia, Randall Raemon
• email, Gwen Gall
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: email, Karen Kay
• FrameMaker Mailing Lists, Paul MacGyver Carman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: FrameMaker Mailing Lists, Julius Willis
  • Re: FrameMaker Mailing Lists, Marc Santacroce
• STC DC Chapter December Meeting (fwd), Charles Fisher
• Re: Salary surveys, Bev Clark
• Thanks for the answer!!, Sue Heim
• Advice for manuals, Paula Reynolds
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Advice for manuals, Romay Jean Sitze
  • Re: Advice for manuals, Doug, Data Librarian at Ext 4225
  • Re: Advice for manuals, John Russell
  • Re: Advice for manuals, Chet Ensign
  • Re: Advice for manuals, Bonni J. Graham
• Last Call for Keywords, LaVonna Funkhouser
• Complete and Accessible, Tom Williams
• Re: Salary surveys/cost of living, Heli Roosild
• Originator of "hypertext", Lisa Baker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Originator of "hypertext", Ray Bruman
  • Re: Originator of "hypertext", Gwen Gall
  • Re: Originator of "hypertext", Glen Accardo
  • Re[2]: Originator of "hypertext", Eric J. Ray
  • Re: Originator of "hypertext", Michael LaTorra
• Networking in Western Washington, Kimberley Lackey
• Thanks + some, Kimberly Wiederman
• OS/2 screen capture utility, Julie Azoulai
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: OS/2 screen capture utility, mrw.EMAIL
• Re: Networking in Western Was..., Grant Hogarth
• Full text search in WinHelp?, McMahon, Mick
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Full text search in WinHelp?, Chet Ensign
• Windows help file browser, John C. Reynolds, III
• UNIX screen capture tool, Mark Levinson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: UNIX screen capture tool, Steve Fouts
  • Re: Unix screen capture tool, Frank Saucier
  • Re: UNIX screen capture tool, Rosie
• Re: Prepositions--ending sentences therewith, John Holland
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Prepositions--ending sentences therewith, Steve Fouts
  • Re: Prepositions--ending sentences therewith, Rosie
• Literate Israelis ye know not of, Mark Levinson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Literate Israelis ye know not of, Arlen_P_Walker%BG-HDQTRS
• TWs in Israel, Marsha Wolicki
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: TWs in Israel, Arlen_P_Walker%BG-HDQTRS
• Forw: OS/2 screen capture utility, Gendreau Simon
• Systems Development and Technical Writing, Robert Ward
• Contract writing (was Job, Barb Philbrick
• Liability Insurance for C, Barb Philbrick
• Seattle area companies & the UW, David Oberstadt
• That and Which--is it worth it?, Gail DeCamp
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: That and Which--is it worth it?, Lori Lathrop
  • Re: That and Which--is it worth it?, Barb Miller
  • Re: That and Which--is it worth it?, Virginia L. Krenn
  • Re: That and Which--is it worth it?, Paula R Berger
  • Re: That and Which--is it worth it?, Nora Merhar
  • Re: That and Which--is it worth it?, Richard Lippincott
  • Re: That and Which--is it worth it?, Jay Cherniak
  • Re: That and Which--is it worth it?, Vicki Rosenzweig
  • Re: That and Which--is it worth it?, Jan Boomsliter
  • Re: That and Which--is it worth it?, Jan Boomsliter
  • Re: That and Which--is it worth it?, Jan Boomsliter
  • Re: That and Which--is it worth it?, Sally Marquigny
  • Re: That and Which--is it worth it?, Sandy, Corinne
• Estimating, Glenn Crumpley
• Professional Liability Insurance for Technical Writers, Cathy Godwin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Professional Liability Insurance for Technical Writers, Robert W. Jones
• Back-formate, Vollbach, Elizabeth
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Back-formate, Barb Miller
  • Re: Back-formate, Karen Kay
  • Back-formate, Richard Mateosian
• The Net Before Christmas, Binion Amerson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The Net Before Christmas, Arlen_P_Walker%BG-HDQTRS
• PORTFOLIO, Gretchen Toth
• Department name?, William J. Hartzer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Department name?, Gordon Meyer
  • Re: Department name?, John M. Gear
• TW jobs, San Francisco bay area, kathy barreto
• Citing electronic sources?, Karen Kay
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Citing electronic sources?, Barb Miller
• Re: Back-formate football?, QMS Account
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Back-formate football?, Jan Boomsliter
• Re: Full text search in WinHelp file, Matt Abe
• That/which, Melissa Hunter-Kilmer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • That/which, Watson Laughton
  • That/Which, Vollbach, Elizabeth
  • that/which, LaVonna Funkhouser
  • Re: That/which, Massi, Jerri
  • FW: That/which, Massi, Jerri
• Fibershere, Cynthia Schwartz
• Mosaic as an online documentation viewing engine?, Typo? What tpyo? 16-Dec-1994 0937
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Mosaic as an online documentation viewing engine?, Richard Lippincott
  • Re: Mosaic as an online documentation viewing engine?, Margaret Thomas
  • Re: Mosaic as an online documentation viewing engine?, Sue Heim
  • Mosaic as an online documentation viewing engine?, Karen Hopp
  • Re: Mosaic as an online documentation viewing engine?, Glenn Forbes Larratt
  • Re: Mosaic as an online documentation viewing engine?, Richard Lippincott
  • Re: Mosaic as an online documentation viewing engine?, Patrick O'Connell
  • Re: Mosaic as an online documentation viewing engine?, Matt Hicks
  • Re: Mosaic as an online documentation viewing engine?, lmann
  • Re: Mosaic as an online documentation viewing engine?, harold (h.o.n.) floysvik
• THAT AND WHICH--IS, Gregg Roberts
• Style question, Kamela J. Salyers
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Style question, Jan Boomsliter
  • Re: Style question, Virginia L. Krenn
  • Re: Style question, Rosie
  • Re: Style Question, Michael LaTorra
  • Re: Style question, Sandy, Corinne
  • Re: Style question, Beverly Parks
• Re: Mosaic as an online ..., Mike Beyries
• backformation, Sherri Hall
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: backformation, Rosie
  • Re: backformation, Karen Kay
  • Re: backformation, Virginia L. Krenn
  • Re: backformation, Vicki Rosenzweig
  • Re: backformation, Richard Lippincott
  • Re: backformation, Ray Bruman
  • Re: backformation, Sally Marquigny
  • Re: backformation, Rosie
• Project Management, Kamela J. Salyers
• Project Management cont., Kamela J. Salyers
• Re: UNIX screen captures, Michael LaTorra
• Marblehead Messenger, Richard Lippincott
• That which doesn't kill you . . ., USA::SOM24502
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: That which doesn't kill you . . ., Romay Jean Sitze
• SGML/FOSI/DSSL help needed., harold (h.o.n.) floysvik
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: SGML/FOSI/DSSL help needed., Chet Ensign
• That/Which Usage, USA::MU17692
• Re: That and Which--is it wor..., Grant Hogarth
• bye, Kimberly Wiederman
• Job: Full-Time Writers, Manual 3 International
• Re: Just Which, Sherri Hall
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Just Which, Carter Hansen
  • Re: Just Which, Jan Boomsliter
• purpose of the apostrophe, Ray Bruman
• [no subject], Richard Mateosian
• Re: That and Which--is it, Marilynne Smith
• Re: that/which, prepositions, split infinitives, Tom Pearsall
• using Mosaic/WWW and ftp to distribute docs, Debbie Campbell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: using Mosaic/WWW and ftp to distribute docs, Chet Ensign
• Computer Documentation Course Announcement, Glenn Forbes Larratt
• certification article, Ronald Lee Stone
• merry christmas, Timothy Schablin
• Reasons for online, QMS Account
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • reasons for online, Caryn Rizell
  • reasons for online, William J. Hartzer
  • Re: reasons for online, Richard Lippincott
  • Re: reasons for online, Virginia L. Krenn
  • Reasons for online, Coleen MacKay
  • Re: reasons for online, Chet Ensign
  • Re: reasons for online, Jan Boomsliter
  • Re: Reasons for online, Jan Boomsliter
  • Re: Reasons for online, Richard Lippincott
  • Re: Reasons for online, Doug, Data Librarian at Ext 4225
  • Re: Reasons for online, Becky Hough/Bristol
  • Re: Reasons for online, Rosie
  • reasons for online -Reply, Lisa Baker
  • Re: Reasons for online, Glen Accardo
  • Re: Reasons for online, Coleen MacKay
  • Re: Reasons for online, Rosie
  • Re: reasons for online, Timothy Schablin
  • Re: Reasons for online, Glen Accardo
  • Re: Reasons for online, Glen Accardo
  • Re: Reasons for online, Ray Bruman
  • Re: Reasons for online, Gwen Gall
  • Re: Reasons for online, Bonni J. Graham
  • Re: Reasons for online, Laura Johnson
  • Re: Reasons for online, Lori Lathrop
  • Re: Reasons for online, Beverly Parks
  • Re: Reasons for online, Nancy Hayes
• Errors & omissions insurance, Alyce Barry
• WARNING: message delayed at "open.ac.uk", Mail-System
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • WARNING: message delayed at "open.ac.uk", Mail-System
  • WARNING: message delayed at "open.ac.uk", Mail-System
• scanned images, Paula Reynolds
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: scanned images, Chadwick
  • Re[2]: scanned images, Arlen P. Walker
  • Re: scanned images, Barb Miller
  • Re: scanned images, PERTTI MSigmaKITALO
  • Re: scanned images, Joyce & Cordell Woods
  • Re[2]: scanned images, Arlen P. Walker
  • Re: scanned images, Romay Jean Sitze
  • Re: scanned images, Kat Nagel
  • Re: Re[2]: scanned images, Carter Hansen
  • Re: scanned images, Carter Hansen
  • Re: Re[2]: scanned images, Romay Jean Sitze
• Re: click on, select, choose, Steve Delanghe
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: click on, select, choose, Ned Bedinger
  • Re: click on, select, choose, mpriestley
  • Re: click on, select, choose, Sally Marquigny
  • Re: click on, select, choose, Susan W. Gallagher
  • Re: click on, select, choose -Reply, Lisa Baker
  • Re: click on, select, choose, CJBenz
  • Re: click on, select, choose, WandaJane Phillips
• Tracking document versions..., Paul MacGyver Carman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Tracking document versions..., Randall Raemon
  • Re: Tracking document versions..., Sherri Hall
  • Re: Tracking document versions..., Susan W. Gallagher
  • Re: Tracking document versions..., WandaJane Phillips
• Metro Baltimore STC January meeting, burgamw1
• Technical Editor Co-op Position at IBM-ITSO, Raleigh, N.C., John Lee Bumgarner
• Setting the LISTSERV to Digest, Chet Ensign
• Info on a product called Masterhelp, Chet Ensign
• Screen Shots, Johns, David
• Humor: Documentation & Tech Support, Ellen Adams
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Humor: Documentation & Tech Support, Mean Green Dancing Machine
• Web browsers for on-line doc viewing, Fred Wersan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Web browsers for on-line doc viewing, Killer of Trees
• Info Specialist job in Knoxville, TN, Karla McMaster
• Modem Speeds, USA::MU17692
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Modem Speeds, Arlen P. Walker
  • Modem Speeds, William J. Hartzer
  • Modem Speeds, Steve Fouts
  • Re: Modem Speeds, Arlen P. Walker
  • Re: Modem Speeds, Rosie
  • Re: Modem Speeds, Karen Kay
  • Modem Speeds, Gwen Barnes
  • Re: Modem Speeds, Matt Abe
• JPEG Image compression, Steve Fouts
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: JPEG Image compression, Grant Hogarth
• Correction-Metro Baltimore STC Jan. meeting, burgamw1
• For Steve Delanghe, IBM manual, arthur zachai
• Mosaic as an online Help documentation viewing engine, Laurie Rubin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Mosaic as an online Help documentation viewing engine, lmann
• (U) Jobs in Tucson, AZ, Victoria Mathews
• Modems and online doc, Ed Westemeier
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Modems and online doc, Gwen Gall
• Re: version-tracking (more), Susan W. Gallagher
• which/that - an exception to the majority opinion, Segal, Betty S.
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: which/that - an exception to the majority opinion, Virginia L. Krenn
  • Re: which/that - an exception to the majority opinion, Linda H. Schoenhoff
• Re: CLICK ON, SE, Gregg Roberts
• Select, David Blyth @second
• In need of graphics from the Internet, Jerre Beal (jbeal)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: In need of graphics from the Internet, Timothy Schablin
• Writing for "the little guy", Gene Bozek
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Writing for "the little guy" -Reply, Lisa Baker
• Masterhelp, George F. Hayhoe III
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Masterhelp, Ed Hoornaert
• Why 2400? It's Faster Than Nothing!, George F. Hayhoe III
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Why 2400? It's Faster Than Nothing!, Lori Lathrop
  • Re: Why 2400? It's Faster Than Nothing!, SuePStewrt
• STC publication proposal reviewers needed, Susan Fowler
• select v choose v click ....., Sandy, Corinne
• Information from TECHWR-L Listowner, Eric J. Ray
• upload / download, Jo Davidsmeyer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: upload / download, Jan Boomsliter
  • Re: upload / download, Karen Kay
  • upload / download, Gwen Barnes
• comments on Web pages, Debbie Campbell
• Re: Reasons for online (hypertext links), Lindamood, Brad
• Deck us all with words of Pogo, harold (h.o.n.) floysvik
• Re: that/which--an exception to majority opinion, Segal, Betty S.
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: that/which--an exception to majority opinion, Carter Hansen
  • Re: that/which--an exception to majority opinion, Mean Green Dancing Machine
• Indexing in FrameMaker, Ray Bruman
• am pm or AM PM, Timothy Schablin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: am pm or AM PM, Arlen P. Walker
  • Re: am pm or AM PM, PICKETT-HARNER, Molly
  • Re: am pm or AM PM, Steve Fouts
  • Re: am pm or AM PM, Virginia L. Krenn
  • Re: am pm or AM PM, Barb Miller
  • Re: am pm or AM PM, Sandy, Corinne
  • Re: am pm or AM PM, Beverly Parks
  • Re[2]: am pm or AM PM, Virginia L. Krenn
  • Re: am pm or AM PM, Marc Santacroce
  • Re: am pm or AM PM, Virginia L. Krenn
  • Re: am pm or AM PM, Beverly Parks
  • Re: am pm or AM PM, Kelly Hoffman
  • Re[2]: am pm or AM PM, Virginia L. Krenn
  • Re: am pm or AM PM, Romay Jean Sitze
• Reminder about FORUM 95, Tom Warren
• Online vs. Paper, Michael LaTorra
• Basic rules of technical writing, CJBenz
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Basic rules of technical writing, JohnBrin
  • Re: Basic rules of technical writing, lmann
  • Re: Basic rules of technical writing, Beverly Parks
  • Re: Basic rules of technical writing, Mean Green Dancing Machine
  • Re: Basic rules of technical writing, Laura Johnson
  • Re: Basic rules of technical writing, Semonian
  • Re: Basic rules of technical writing, CJBenz
  • Re: Basic rules of technical writing, CJBenz
  • Re: Basic rules of technical writing, Beverly Parks
  • Re: Basic rules of technical writing, CJBenz
  • Re: Basic rules of technical writing, CJBenz
  • Re: Basic rules of technical writing, Sally Marquigny
  • Re: Basic rules of technical writing, hsweeney
  • Re: Basic rules of technical writing, Bonni J. Graham
  • Re: Basic rules of technical writing, Laura Johnson
  • Re: Basic rules of technical writing, Joseph J Little
  • Re: Basic rules of technical writing, Joseph J Little
  • Basic rules of technical writing, Lawrence \"Lonnie\" Brennan
  • Re: Basic rules of technical writing, Mary Moore
  • Re: Basic rules of technical writing, Robert E. Allen
• Delete if you don't want a Christmas Card, Arlen P. Walker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Delete if you don't want a Christmas Card, Massi, Jerri
• Re: Microsoft takes over RC, Gwen Gall
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Microsoft takes over RC, Terry Riffey
  • Re: Microsoft takes over RC, lmann
  • Re[2]: Microsoft takes over RC, Virginia L. Krenn
  • Re[2]: Microsoft takes over RC, Art Elser
  • Re[3]: Microsoft takes over RC, Arlen P. Walker
  • Re: Microsoft takes over RC, Marc Santacroce
  • Re[3]: Microsoft takes over RC, Virginia L. Krenn
  • Re[3]: Microsoft takes over RC, Michael LaTorra
  • Re[3]: Microsoft takes over RC, Gwen Barnes
  • Re: Re[3]: Microsoft takes over RC, lmann
• backformations - the last word, Katie Henry x3432
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: backformations - the last word, Sandy, Corinne
• STC Web Home Page, Linda McKenna
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: STC Web Home Page, Eric Schieler
  • Re: STC Web Home Page, Jan Boomsliter
  • Re: STC Web Home Page, Timothy Schablin
  • Re: STC Web Home Page, Marc Santacroce
  • Re: STC Web Home Page, John Russell
  • Re: STC Web Home Page, lawrence lavigne jr
  • STC Web Home Page, Liz Babcock
  • Re: STC Web Home Page, Mike Mcgraw
• Keeping your nose clean, Mark Levinson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Keeping your nose clean, Arlen P. Walker
  • Re: Keeping your nose clean, Jan Boomsliter
• [no subject], Richard Mateosian
• Information needed, Sandy, Corinne
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Information needed, Chet Ensign
  • Re: Information needed, Carter Hansen
  • Re: Information needed, burgamw1
  • Re: information needed, Chet Ensign
• It is a.m. and p.m., David Dubin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • It is a.m. and p.m., David Dubin
  • Re: It is a.m. and p.m., Virginia L. Krenn
• Re: Grammar and usage, PJ Rose
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Grammar and usage, Beverly Parks
  • Re: Grammar and usage, Romay Jean Sitze
  • Re: Grammar and usage, Sue Heim
  • Re: Grammar and usage, Laurie Rubin
  • Re[2]: Grammar and usage, Virginia L. Krenn
  • Re: Grammar and usage, Beverly Parks
  • Re: Grammar and usage, PICKETT-HARNER, Molly
  • Re: Grammar and usage, Vicki Rosenzweig
  • Re: Grammar and usage, Jan Boomsliter
  • Re: Grammar and usage, Janice Gelb
• HTML, WWW at the SGML Forum of NY, Chet Ensign
• Re: backformations, Lori A. Moreland
• Robohelp training- Atlanta, Sandy, Corinne
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Robohelp training- Atlanta, Gwen Barnes
  • Re: Robohelp training- Atlanta, John Russell
  • Re: Robohelp training- Atlanta, Romay Jean Sitze
• Online vs. Paper (fwd), Sherri Hall
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Online vs. Paper (fwd), Gwen Gall
  • Re: Online vs. Paper (fwd), Kelly Hoffman
• OPENING FOR MULTIMEDIA PROGRAMMER/DESIGNER, Laurel Meier
• Documenting an OO class library, Colleen Pars
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Documenting an OO class library, Laurie Rubin
  • Re: Documenting an OO class library, Susan Fowler
  • Documenting an OO class library, Susan Gallagher
• help on techwr-l commands, Caryn Rizell
• TW openings, Phoenix, AZ, Carl Gotlieb
• Indices in FrameMaker, Robert Crews
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Indices in FrameMaker, Frank Stearns
  • Re: Indices in FrameMaker, Shannon Tribich
  • Re: Indices in FrameMaker, lmann
  • Re: Indices in FrameMaker, Frank Stearns
  • Re: Indices in FrameMaker, Lori Lathrop
• Re: Redundancy and hazards, Susan Fowler
• Cindex review & related issues, Lori Lathrop
• Forms-generator Program?, doug montalbano
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Forms-generator Program?, William J. Hartzer
• said many ways . . ., Elaine Winters
• a.m. vs A.M., Gordon Meyer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: a.m. vs A.M., Beverly Parks
  • Re: a.m. vs A.M., CJBenz
• What is ITM?, Lori Lathrop
• Indexes - Printed vs. On-line, QMS Account
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Indexes - Printed vs. On-line, Lori Lathrop
  • Indexes - Printed vs. On-line, Mark Levinson
  • Re: Indexes - Printed vs. On-line, Richard Lippincott
  • Re: Indexes - Printed vs. On-line, Jan Bates
  • Re: Indexes - Printed vs. On-line, Beverly Parks
  • Re: Indexes - Printed vs. On-line, Sandy, Corinne
  • Re: Indexes - Printed vs. On-line, Karen Kay
  • Re: Indexes - Printed vs. On-line, Romay Jean Sitze
  • Re: Indexes - Printed vs. On-line, Romay Jean Sitze
  • Re: Indexes - Printed vs. On-line, Chet Ensign
  • Re: Indexes - Printed vs. On-line, Lori Lathrop
• Re: ITM, holland
• Our Windowmacher, right or wrong, Mark Levinson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Our Windowmacher, right or wrong, Sue Heim
• Simple indexing program, QMS Account
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Simple indexing program, Dick Price
  • Re: Simple indexing program, Lori Lathrop
• Re: Trademark restrictions (Kleenex, etc.), Sandy, Corinne
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Trademark restrictions (Kleenex, etc.), Win Day
• Since v because, Sandy, Corinne
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Since v because, Virginia L. Krenn
  • Re: Since v because, Gwen Gall
  • Re[2]: Since v because, Virginia L. Krenn
• Fwd: Pentium meets 2001, Gwen Gall
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Fwd: Pentium meets 2001, doug montalbano
  • Re: Fwd: Pentium meets 2001, Virginia L. Krenn
• Copyright (was Re: backformations - the last word), Mean Green Dancing Machine
• Software Glitch, Fred Butzen
• Microsoft & RC Church, William J. Hartzer
• Re: The golden rules of writing, naomi (n.) bulka
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The golden rules of writing, David Hancock
• tech. writer seeks work in Houston area, Debbie Campbell
• Costs of Translation, mrw.EMAIL
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Costs of Translation, Tony Roder
• [no subject], Jan Boomsliter
• too late for Christmas, but..., Kelly Graham MCOM
• Response to PJ Rose, Susan Purcell
• ?other "golden" rules?, Michael Keene
• cmsg cancel <3d9jt9$m2h -at- tadpole -dot- fc -dot- hp -dot- com>, Laura Johnson
• since vs. because, Lisa Steinberg
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: since vs. because, Beverly Parks
• on-line vs. paper, Lisa Steinberg
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • on-line vs. paper, Lisa Steinberg
• Fwd: Legal rights while wearing a bunny outfit, Gwen Gall
• Fwd: Pentium jokes, Gwen Gall
• Fwd: Your piece, Gwen Gall
• couth/uncouth, Michael LaTorra
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: couth/uncouth, Karen Kay
• Chris Benz's Rules (modified), Debbie Campbell
• Golden Rules of Writing, Liz Babcock
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Golden Rules of Writing, Laura Johnson
  • Re: Golden Rules of Writing, Michael LaTorra
• Re: e-mail or email?, CJBenz
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: e-mail or email?, Timothy Schablin
  • Re: e-mail or email?, Jan Boomsliter
  • Re: e-mail or email?, Beverly Parks
  • Re: e-mail or email?, Timothy Schablin
• Re: Use of TMs, SuePStewrt
• Tech Writing Job in Fairfax, VA, Charles Fisher
• Re: too late for Christmas OR EVER, ACTUALLY, John M. Gear
• Re: Golden Rules, Kat Nagel
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Golden Rules, David Blyth @second
• High noon, Mark Levinson
• What's this grammar-bashing?, Mark Levinson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What's this grammar-bashing?, Mean Green Dancing Machine
• warranty info in a manual, Kelly Kremin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • warranty info in a manual, Art Elser
  • Re: warranty info in a manual, Kelly Kremin
  • Re: warranty info in a manual, Michael LaTorra
  • Re[2]: warranty info in a manual, Virginia L. Krenn
  • Re: Re[2]: warranty info in a manual, Karen Kay
• Noon and Midnight, Paul MacGyver Carman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • noon and midnight, Beverly Parks
• midnight Friday, Beverly Parks
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: midnight Friday, Kelly Hoffman
  • Re: midnight Friday, Beverly Parks
• Greetings, Gendreau Simon
• Because v As, Beverly Parks
• No place for ads, Beverly Parks
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: No place for ads, Romay Jean Sitze
  • no place for ads, Sherri Hall
• Documenting Object Oriented Class Library, Beverly Parks
• Job Posting--VA, Maureen Costantino
• How we read, Robert H. Bohle
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: How we read, Romay Jean Sitze
• Freelance Tech Writing?, Michael Mooney
• The Golden Rules, David Blyth @second
• Getting Into Tech Writing?, Michael Mooney
• See ya after the holidays, Barb Miller
• time stamp or timestamp?, Gail DeCamp
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: time stamp or timestamp?, Howard Kaikow
  • Re: time stamp or timestamp?, Beverly Parks
  • time stamp or timestamp?, Kathy Moore
• Re: I, tpis!gregg . roberts
• Carolina Chapter, STC: Meeting Announcement, USA::MU17692
• What's Online?, Audrey Choden
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What's Online?, Johns, David
• professional indexers, Charles Cantrell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: professional indexers, Susan W. Gallagher
  • Re: professional indexers, Lori Lathrop
  • Re: professional indexers, Beverly Parks
  • Re: professional indexers, jhedtke
• a.m., p.m./noon, midnight, Segal, Betty S.
• Robohelp training- Atlant, Keith Soltys
• Document Management, Hogle, Pam
• APOLOGY, tpis!gregg . roberts
• ON-SCREEN EDITING, tpis!gregg . roberts
• Re: Revision Tracking, DeLibre
• Style Sheets Needed, Averell Eisner
• Re: health insurance for contractors, Kelly Kremin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • health insurance for contractors, Kathryn Seifert
  • Re: health insurance for contractors, Sandy, Corinne
  • Re: health insurance for contractors, Joyce & Cordell Woods
  • Re: health insurance for contractors, Steve Fouts
  • Re: health insurance for contractors, Chris Silker
  • Health Insurance for Contractors, Kathleen Nosbisch
  • Fwd: Re: health insurance for contractors, Chris Silker
  • Re: health insurance for contractors, Romay Jean Sitze
  • Re: Health Insurance for Contractors, Ellen Adams
  • Re: Health Insurance for Contractors, Ellen Adams
  • Re: Health Insurance for Contractors, PJ Rose
  • Re: Health Insurance for Contractors, D. Citron
  • Re: Health Insurance for Contractors, Romay Jean Sitze
  • Re: Health Insurance for Contractors, D Citron
  • Re: Health Insurance for Contractors, D. Citron
• Music indexing, Dick Price
• Books or articles on Doc. Mgmt, Chet Ensign
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Books or articles on Doc. Mgmt, Susan Fowler
• Whose image suffers, Richard Mateosian
• Technical correctness, Richard Mateosian
• job opening in Houston, Glen Accardo
• OED Help! (was couth/uncouth), Michael LaTorra
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: OED Help! (was couth/uncouth), Sandy, Corinne
  • Re: OED Help! (was couth/uncouth), Valerie Archambeau
  • Re: OED Help! (was couth/uncouth), Ann Amsler
  • Re: OED Help! (was couth/uncouth), Karen Kay
  • Re: OED Help! (was couth/uncouth), Kathryn Seifert
  • Re: OED Help! (was couth/uncouth), Gwen Gall
  • Re: OED Help! (was couth/uncouth), Romay Jean Sitze
• job opening in Chicago, Daniel R. Jones
• Freelance Courseware Developers needed, Will Kelly
• Re: TECHWR-L Digest - 23 Dec 1994 to 24 Dec 1994, Dana B. Mackonis, I are a writer, DTN 381-1283
• Warranty info..., Lisa Steinberg
• On-Screen Editing and Full Screen Monitors, Bruce Faron
• Re: Trigger, Tim Pera
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Trigger, Rosie
  • Re: Trigger, Dan Glovier
  • Re: Trigger, Susan W. Gallagher
  • TRIGGER, tpis!gregg . roberts
  • Trigger, Sandy, Corinne
  • Re: Trigger, Robert E. Allen
  • Re: Trigger, Romay Jean Sitze
• Basic Rules number 3, Beverly Parks
• e-mail or email or E-Mail?, Beverly Parks
• Platform-independent online help, Kelly Thompson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Platform-independent online help, Jan Bates
  • Re: Platform-independent online help, Chet Ensign
• Citations or Plugs?, Beverly Parks
• insurance, Teri Olsen
• Graphics Tablet, Beverly Parks
• Royalties, how much?, T. Kelley Boylan
• Rules to Write By, Gwen Gall
• Know Your Audience, Gwen Gall
• Info on Adobe Acrobat, Rick S. Sapir
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Info on Adobe Acrobat, Chet Ensign
• Word 2 - Text Trapped in a Field Code, Rosie
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Word 2 - Text Trapped in a Field Code, Howard Kaikow
  • Re: Word 2 - Text Trapped in a Field Code, Rosie
• Length of Help Context ID, Eady, Sandra
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Length of Help Context ID, Susan W. Gallagher
  • Re: Length of Help Context ID, Chet Ensign
• Job in Wash DC area, Sara K. Brown
• Help! Need info CO,OK job market, Chas Lewis
• Basic rules of technical writing: A summary?, CJBenz
• NON-D, tpis!gregg . roberts
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: NON-D, Rosie
• [no subject], evelyn west
• Basic rules& Churchill, Elizabeth L. Reed
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Basic rules& Churchill, KnoxML1
• FW: NON-DELIVERY of: Trigger, Sandy, Corinne
• Quotation wording, LaVonna Funkhouser
• Tradeoff between precision and clarity, Larry Kunz ((919) 254-6395)
• Internet Programming List, Sandy, Corinne
• FrameMaker/OS2, laurence hoess
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • FrameMaker/OS2, Chuck Blessing
  • Re: FrameMaker/OS2, D. Citron
• a second for McPhee, Matt Hicks
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • a second for McPhee, Marilynne Smith
• Corel Ventura 5, Beverly Parks
• Help needed with Home Pages, Mark Sanders
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Help needed with Home Pages, jcurran
  • Re: Help needed with Home Pages, lmann
  • Re: Help needed with Home Pages, Chet Ensign
• File name or Filename?, Sue Heim
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • File name or Filename?, Sherri Hall
• Winhelp Mailing List, -HL-77163d
• Word 6 filters for Frame 4?, thoyt -at- qualcomm -dot- com
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Word 6 filters for Frame 4?, Susan W. Gallagher
  • Re: Word 6 filters for Frame 4?, PJ Rose
• Blank off, Tricia Porter
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Blank off, Win Day
  • Re: Blank off, Rick Lippincott
• CCCC person needed, Dickie Selfe
• January SF STC meeting, Bob Seitz
• Re: Word 2 - Text Wrapped in a, Gordon Meyer
• Re: Word 6 filters for Frame 4, Gordon Meyer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Word 6 filters for Frame 4, Howard Kaikow
• Re: professional indexing, Jack Shaw
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: professional indexing, Kelly Hoffman
• Re: Health insurance rates, Kat Nagel
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Health insurance rates, CJBenz
• Re: filename?, Kat Nagel
• Need tech editor, copy editor for PC book, Stephen W. Sagman
• Screen prototyping program, Paul Lunstrum
• Goodbye - No Mail for me, Kay Wicker - Documentation
• Getting information, Mean Green Dancing Machine
• Manuscript Formats, William Boswell
• Writers needed - Seattle area!, jhedtke
• [no subject], Richard Mateosian
• Re: your mail, Geoffrey Marnell

---

Thread Index (Switch to Author Index)

---

---

---